457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23172504)
1. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling.
Jorge JR; Barao VA; Delben JA; Assuncao WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 23527343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of abutment type and esthetic veneering on preload maintenance of abutment screw of implant-supported crowns.
Delben JA; Barão VA; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 23725369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study.
Schulte JK; Coffey J
Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9206402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different maintenance time of torque application on detorque values of abutment screws in full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Al-Otaibi HN; Al-Fouzan AF; Al-Mufleh TS; Labban N
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):848-851. PubMed ID: 30110139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detorque evaluation of dental abutment screws after immersion in a fluoridated artificial saliva solution.
Duarte AR; Neto JP; Souza JC; Bonachela WC
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 23107466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of Sealing Agents on Preload Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses.
Seloto CB; Strazzi Sahyon HB; Dos Santos PH; Delben JA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):123–126. PubMed ID: 28938032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study.
Cardoso M; Torres MF; Lourenço EJ; de Moraes Telles D; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 21457352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preload evaluation of different screws in external hexagon joint.
Assunção WG; Delben JA; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Garcia IR
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22228458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of preload values in gold and titanium dental implant retaining screws.
Doolabh R; Dullabh HD; Sykes LM
SADJ; 2014 Aug; 69(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 26548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses.
Siamos G; Winkler S; Boberick KG
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 12498448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the casting technique and dynamic loading on screw detorque and misfit of single unit implant-supported prostheses.
Bhering CL; Takahashi JM; Luthi LF; Henriques GE; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):404-9. PubMed ID: 22607236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screw Joint Stability in Conventional and Abutment-Free Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations.
Scherg S; Karl M
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 26929952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations.
Stüker RA; Teixeira ER; Beck JC; da Costa NP
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19089290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
