These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations. Puscas L; Sharp SR; Schwab B; Lee WT Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 22249622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Council of emergency medicine residency directors standardized letter of recommendation writers' questionnaire. Hegarty CB; Lane DR; Love JN; Doty CI; DeIorio NM; Ronan-Bentle S; Howell J J Grad Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 6(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 24949136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Under the microscope: assessing surgical aptitude of otolaryngology residency applicants. Carlson ML; Archibald DJ; Sorom AJ; Moore EJ Laryngoscope; 2010 Jun; 120(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 20513025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Inaccuracy of the global assessment score in the emergency medicine standard letter of recommendation. Oyama LC; Kwon M; Fernandez JA; Fernández-Frackelton M; Campagne DD; Castillo EM; Lin M Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():S38-41. PubMed ID: 21199082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Validity Evidence for a Residency Admissions Standardized Assessment Letter for Pediatrics. Bajwa NM; Yudkowsky R; Belli D; Vu NV; Park YS Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(2):173-183. PubMed ID: 29190140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The Utility of the Standardized Letter of Recommendation for Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants: A Systematic Review. Gordon AM; Mont MA; Choueka J Orthopedics; 2024; 47(1):e1-e5. PubMed ID: 37672777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE): Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format. Jackson JS; Bond M; Love JN; Hegarty C J Grad Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 11(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 31024650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of resident applicants by letters of recommendation: a comparison of traditional and behavior-based formats. O'Halloran CM; Altmaier EM; Smith WL; Franken EA Invest Radiol; 1993 Mar; 28(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 8486498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Still under the microscope: can a surgical aptitude test predict otolaryngology resident performance? Moore EJ; Price DL; Van Abel KM; Carlson ML Laryngoscope; 2015 Feb; 125(2):E57-61. PubMed ID: 24945869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Predictors of future success in otolaryngology residency applicants. Chole RA; Ogden MA Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 138(8):707-12. PubMed ID: 22911295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Emergency medicine standardized letter of recommendation: predictors of guaranteed match. Girzadas DV; Harwood RC; Delis SN; Stevison K; Keng G; Cipparrone N; Carlson A; Tsonis GD Acad Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 8(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 11388941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective. Masciello M; Malekzadeh S Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The State of the Otolaryngology Match: A Review of Applicant Trends, "Impossible" Qualifications, and Implications. Bowe SN; Schmalbach CE; Laury AM Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun; 156(6):985-990. PubMed ID: 28319452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A multicenter study of the family educational rights and privacy act and the standardized letter of recommendation: impact on emergency medicine residency applicant and faculty behaviors. Diab J; Riley S; Downes A; Gaeta T; Hern HG; Hwang E; Kass L; Kelly M; Luber SD; Martel M; Minns A; Patterson L; Pazderka P; Sayan O; Thurman J; Vallee P; Overton D J Grad Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 6(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 24949134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Predictors of a Top Performer During Emergency Medicine Residency. Bhat R; Takenaka K; Levine B; Goyal N; Garg M; Visconti A; Oyama L; Castillo E; Broder J; Omron R; Hayden S J Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 49(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 26242925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of the final adjective in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation on determination of applicant desirability. Ward MA; Palazzi DL; Lorin MI; Agrawal A; Frankenthal H; Turner TL Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1542922. PubMed ID: 30406730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Factors Affecting Candidate Placement on an Emergency Medicine Residency Program's Rank Order List. Breyer MJ; Sadosty A; Biros M West J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 13(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 23359215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Perspectives on the quality and utility of letters conforming to the AAIM guidelines. Williams C; Alweis R; Roth T; Luther V; Pile J; Elkins S; Nagalla S; Muchmore EA J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect; 2021 Mar; 11(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 33889315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Measuring Nontechnical Aspects of Surgical Clinician Development in an Otolaryngology Residency Training Program. Shin JJ; Cunningham MJ; Emerick KG; Gray ST JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 May; 142(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26913378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]