BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23172842)

  • 1. Stress dissipation in the bone through various crown materials of dental implant restoration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
    Bijjargi S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 23172842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Menini M; Conserva E; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Signori A; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 24179969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
    Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
    Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A; Langot C
    Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 22209573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Sertgöz A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns.
    de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ; de Jager N; Kuijs R; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25819357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of heat transfer to the implant-bone interface when drilling through a zirconia crown attached to a titanium or zirconia abutment.
    Mason AG; Sutton A; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1119-25. PubMed ID: 24951389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.