These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23172842)

  • 41. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
    Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implant dimensions on periimplant stress of splinted implant-supported crowns: a finite element analysis.
    Bayraktar M; Gultekin BA; Yalcin S; Mijiritsky E
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 23823738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In Silico Finite Element Analysis of Implant-Supported CAD-CAM Resin Composite Crowns.
    Karaer O; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Terzioglu H
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 35509150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method.
    Nakamura T; Imanishi A; Kashima H; Ohyama T; Ishigaki S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 12066632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stress distribution in bone: single-unit implant prostheses veneered with porcelain or a new composite material.
    Juodzbalys G; Kubilius R; Eidukynas V; Raustia AM
    Implant Dent; 2005 Jun; 14(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 15968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism.
    Göre E; Evlioğlu G
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22242658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Finite element analysis studies of a metal-ceramic crown on a first premolar tooth.
    Proos KA; Swain MV; Ironside J; Steven GP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 12475155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Splinting effect on posterior implants under various loading modes: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Hauchard E; Fournier BP; Jacq R; Bouton A; Pierrisnard L; Naveau A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Sep; 19(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 22645793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants.
    Kohal RJ; Papavasiliou G; Kamposiora P; Tripodakis A; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11951811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factorial analysis of variables influencing stress in all-ceramic crowns.
    Rekow ED; Harsono M; Janal M; Thompson VP; Zhang G
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 16000218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.