These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173199)

  • 1. Finite element modelling versus classic beam theory: comparing methods for stress estimation in a morphologically diverse sample of vertebrate long bones.
    Brassey CA; Margetts L; Kitchener AC; Withers PJ; Manning PL; Sellers WI
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Feb; 10(79):20120823. PubMed ID: 23173199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element analysis of a femur to deconstruct the paradox of bone curvature.
    Jade S; Tamvada KH; Strait DS; Grosse IR
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():53-63. PubMed ID: 24099719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of digital image-based finite element models.
    Guldberg RE; Hollister SJ; Charras GT
    J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 10412392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy Quantification of the Reverse Engineering and High-Order Finite Element Analysis of Equine MC3 Forelimb.
    Mouloodi S; Rahmanpanah H; Burvill C; Davies HMS
    J Equine Vet Sci; 2019 Jul; 78():94-106. PubMed ID: 31203991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D Finite Element Analysis of the Modular Prosthesis with Tooth Mechanism of the Femoral Shaft.
    Zhang JF; Hu YC; Wang BC; Wang L; Wang H; Li Y; Yan M; Liu HT
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):946-956. PubMed ID: 32383353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA.
    Dos Santos MBF; Meloto GO; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Jun; 20(8):893-900. PubMed ID: 28347170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of a new algorithm on a three-dimensional finite element model construction of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics.
    Sato Y; Teixeira ER; Tsuga K; Shindoi N
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Aug; 26(8):640-3. PubMed ID: 10447817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of animal and human bones for predicting probable location of fractures.
    Manarvi I
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2194-2197. PubMed ID: 28268766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of experimental, analytical, and computational methods to determine long-bone bending stiffness.
    Collins CJ; Yang B; Crenshaw TD; Ploeg HL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104253. PubMed ID: 33360160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrete element and finite element methods provide similar estimations for hip joint contact mechanics during walking gait.
    Li M; Venäläinen MS; Chandra SS; Patel R; Fripp J; Engstrom C; Korhonen RK; Töyräs J; Crozier S
    J Biomech; 2021 Jan; 115():110163. PubMed ID: 33338974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the local solution accuracy of large-scale digital image-based finite element analyses.
    Charras GT; Guldberg RE
    J Biomech; 2000 Feb; 33(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 10653042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress distribution around osseointegrated implants with different internal-cone connections: photoelastic and finite element analysis.
    Anami LC; da Costa Lima JM; Takahashi FE; Neisser MP; Noritomi PY; Bottino MA
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 23750560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Free body analysis, beam mechanics, and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis.
    Porro LB; Holliday CM; Anapol F; Ontiveros LC; Ontiveros LT; Ross CF
    J Morphol; 2011 Aug; 272(8):910-37. PubMed ID: 21567445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curved Beam Computed Tomography based Structural Rigidity Analysis of Bones with Simulated Lytic Defect: A Comparative Study with Finite Element Analysis.
    Oftadeh R; Karimi Z; Villa-Camacho J; Tanck E; Verdonschot N; Goebel R; Snyder BD; Hashemi HN; Vaziri A; Nazarian A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32397. PubMed ID: 27585495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
    Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth.
    Romeed SA; Fok SL; Wilson NH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 16512887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tissue modulus calculated from beam theory is biased by bone size and geometry: implications for the use of three-point bending tests to determine bone tissue modulus.
    van Lenthe GH; Voide R; Boyd SK; Müller R
    Bone; 2008 Oct; 43(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 18639658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of pullout strength in different designs of pedicle screws for osteoporotic bone quality using finite element analysis.
    Yang SC; Liu PH; Tu YK
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(3):57-66. PubMed ID: 31798015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.