117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2317346)
1. Histological evaluation of prostatic cancer. (II): Reproducibility of a histological grading system.
Svanholm H; Starklint H; Barlebo H; Olsen S
APMIS; 1990 Mar; 98(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 2317346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological evaluation of prostatic cancer. (III): Reproducibility of assessment of tumour volume and its possible significance for prognosis.
Svanholm H; Starklint H; Barlebo H; Olsen S
APMIS; 1990 Mar; 98(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 2317347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histological evaluation of prostatic cancer. 1. Reproducibility of tumour type.
Svanholm H; Starklint H; Barlebo H; Olsen S
APMIS; 1989 Aug; 97(8):699-704. PubMed ID: 2548542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological grading of prostatic carcinoma in prostatectomy specimens. Comparison of prognostic accuracy of five grading systems.
Gallee MP; Ten Kate FJ; Mulder PG; Blom JH; van der Heul RO
Br J Urol; 1990 Apr; 65(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2340371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grading of prostatic cancer: III. Multivariate analysis of prognostic parameters.
Schroeder FH; Hop WC; Blom JH; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 7(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 4080650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading of prostatic cancer: II. The prognostic significance of the presence of multiple architectural patterns.
Schroeder FH; Blom JH; Hop WC; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 6(4):403-15. PubMed ID: 4088953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Sinagowitz E
Pathol Res Pract; 1980; 168(1-3):115-25. PubMed ID: 7433250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The updated grading system of prostate carcinoma: an inter-observer agreement study among general pathologists in an academic practice.
Al Nemer AM; Elsharkawy T; Elshawarby M; Al-Tamimi D; Kussaibi H; Ahmed A
APMIS; 2017 Nov; 125(11):957-961. PubMed ID: 28913842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grading of prostatic cancer (I): An analysis of the prognostic significance of single characteristics.
Schroeder FH; Blom JH; Hop WC; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 6(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 3969374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardisation of canine meningioma grading: Inter-observer agreement and recommendations for reproducible histopathologic criteria.
Belluco S; Marano G; Baiker K; Beineke A; Oevermann A; Seehusen F; Boracchi P; Pumarola M; Mandara MT
Vet Comp Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(2):509-520. PubMed ID: 35066998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.
Abdollahi A; Meysamie A; Sheikhbahaei S; Ahmadi A; Moradi-Tabriz H; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
Urol J; 2012; 9(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 22641492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the revised 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading system of endometrial cancers with special emphasis on nuclear grading.
Nielsen AL; Thomsen HK; Nyholm HC
Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(10):2303-9. PubMed ID: 1913466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reproducibility of histologic diagnosis and grading for adult soft-tissue sarcomas.
Hasegawa T; Yamamoto S; Nojima T; Hirose T; Nikaido T; Yamashiro K; Matsuno Y
Hum Pathol; 2002 Jan; 33(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11823981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.
Malpica A; Deavers MT; Tornos C; Kurman RJ; Soslow R; Seidman JD; Munsell MF; Gaertner E; Frishberg D; Silva EG
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Aug; 31(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 17667538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereologically estimated mean nuclear volume of prostatic cancer is a reliable prognostic parameter.
Arima K; Sugimura Y; Hioki T; Yamashita A; Kawamura J
Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 9231924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
