188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173665)
1. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments.
Harker J; Kleijnen J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Dec; 10(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 23173665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.
Watt A; Cameron A; Sturm L; Lathlean T; Babidge W; Blamey S; Facey K; Hailey D; Norderhaug I; Maddern G
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18400114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice?
Watt A; Cameron A; Sturm L; Lathlean T; Babidge W; Blamey S; Facey K; Hailey D; Norderhaug I; Maddern G
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Nov; 78(11):1037-40. PubMed ID: 18959712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review on embracing cultural diversity for developing and sustaining a healthy work environment in healthcare.
Pearson A; Srivastava R; Craig D; Tucker D; Grinspun D; Bajnok I; Griffin P; Long L; Porritt K; Han T; Gi AA
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2007 Mar; 5(1):54-91. PubMed ID: 21631782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-trends in health technology assessments: an analysis of developments in composition of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002.
Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 16262973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health economic evaluations: how to find them.
Alton V; Eckerlund I; Norlund A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 16984686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [SR/PS-method for using data of primary studies from systematic reviews in the evaluation of health technologies].
Gorenoi V; Hagen A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(5-6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25066352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Rapid Reviews: Sisyphos' Salvation? - An Inventory].
Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
Gesundheitswesen; 2017 May; 79(5):438-442. PubMed ID: 25985227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.
Silva MT; Silva END; Barreto JOM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29884121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consideration of health inequalities in systematic reviews: a mapping review of guidance.
Maden M
Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):202. PubMed ID: 27894332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology.
Varker T; Forbes D; Dell L; Weston A; Merlin T; Hodson S; O'Donnell M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1199-204. PubMed ID: 26123092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Locating systematic reviews of test accuracy studies: how five specialist review databases measure up.
Bayliss SE; Davenport C
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 18828934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
