188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173665)
21. The Healthcare Improvement Scotland evidence note rapid review process: providing timely, reliable evidence to inform imperative decisions on healthcare.
McIntosh HM; Calvert J; Macpherson KJ; Thompson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2016 Jun; 14(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 27058251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rapid method for rigorous assessment of radiologic imaging technologies.
Sunshine JH; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):549-57. PubMed ID: 9015089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?
Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 27751191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
McGowan J; Sampson M; Salzwedel DM; Cogo E; Foerster V; Lefebvre C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():40-6. PubMed ID: 27005575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Association between methodological characteristics and outcome in health technology assessments which included case series.
Stein K; Dalziel K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Round A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 16110706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth.
Smith V
Pract Midwife; 2013 Apr; 16(4):40-2. PubMed ID: 23687877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study.
Goossen K; Hess S; Lunny C; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):138. PubMed ID: 32487023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.
Ganann R; Ciliska D; Thomas H
Implement Sci; 2010 Jul; 5():56. PubMed ID: 20642853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews.
Nixon J; Duffy S; Armstrong N; Craig D; Glanville J; Christie J; Drummond M; Kleijnen J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 15446753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of databases other than medline for rapid health technology assessments.
Lorenzetti DL; Topfer LA; Dennett L; Clement F
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Apr; 30(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24774535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Survey of Cochrane protocols found methods for data extraction from figures not mentioned or unclear.
Vucic K; Jelicic Kadic A; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1161-4. PubMed ID: 25577327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.
Haby MM; Barreto JOM; Kim JYH; Peiris S; Mansilla C; Torres M; Guerrero-Magaña DE; Reveiz L
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 37696668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses.
Garritty C; Stevens A; Gartlehner G; King V; Kamel C;
Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):184. PubMed ID: 27793186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of evidence-based practice in an aid organisation: a proposal to deal with the variety in terminology and methodology.
De Buck E; Pauwels NS; Dieltjens T; Vandekerckhove P
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2014 Mar; 12(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 24685899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic reviews and tech mining: A methodological comparison with case study.
Anderson PF; Shannon C; Bickett S; Doucette J; Herring P; Kepsel A; Lyons T; McLachlan S; Wu L
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):540-550. PubMed ID: 30129708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review.
Stich AK; Mozygemba K; Lysdahl KB; Pfadenhauer LM; Hofmann B; van der Wilt GJ; Gerhardus A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 30919794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments.
Hailey D; Corabian P; Harstall C; Schneider W
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(2):651-6. PubMed ID: 10932429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating.
Martínez García L; Pardo-Hernandez H; Superchi C; Niño de Guzman E; Ballesteros M; Ibargoyen Roteta N; McFarlane E; Posso M; Roqué I Figuls M; Rotaeche Del Campo R; Sanabria AJ; Selva A; Solà I; Vernooij RWM; Alonso-Coello P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():11-24. PubMed ID: 28549931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare-An integrative review of methodological guidance.
Weise A; Büchter R; Pieper D; Mathes T
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):760-779. PubMed ID: 32920989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
