188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173665)
41. Peer review of searches for studies for health technology assessments, systematic reviews, and other evidence syntheses.
Lefebvre C; Duffy S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2021 May; 37(1):e64. PubMed ID: 34024305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach.
Munn Z; Lockwood C; Moola S
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2015 Jun; 12(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 25996621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes.
García-Altés A; Ondategui-Parra S; Neumann PJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 15446760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ten recommendations for assessing the comparative effectiveness of therapeutic medical devices: a targeted review and adaptation.
Schnell-Inderst P; Hunger T; Conrads-Frank A; Arvandi M; Siebert U
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():97-113. PubMed ID: 29107757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Ethics in health technology assessment. Review].
García-León FJ
J Healthc Qual Res; 2019; 34(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 30723066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Towards a taxonomy of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A priori, staged, and iterative approaches.
Rehfuess EA; Booth A; Brereton L; Burns J; Gerhardus A; Mozygemba K; Oortwijn W; Pfadenhauer LM; Tummers M; van der Wilt GJ; Rohwer A
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 28677339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Technology assessment in health care: methodological and operational questions].
Krauss-Silva L
Cad Saude Publica; 2004; 20 Suppl 2():S199-207. PubMed ID: 15608934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance.
Büchter RB; Weise A; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):259. PubMed ID: 33076832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts.
Hartling L; Guise JM; Kato E; Anderson J; Belinson S; Berliner E; Dryden DM; Featherstone R; Mitchell MD; Motu'apuaka M; Noorani H; Paynter R; Robinson KA; Schoelles K; Umscheid CA; Whitlock E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1451-62.e3. PubMed ID: 26278023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. European Network for Health Technology Assessment's Response to COVID-19: Rapid Collaborative Reviews on Diagnostic Tests and Rolling and Rapid Collaborative Reviews on Therapeutics.
Ballini L; Wild C; Djuric O; Mayer-Ferbas J; Willemsen A; Huic M;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Mar; 38(1):e22. PubMed ID: 35477493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Methodological guidance for incorporating equity when informing rapid-policy and guideline development.
Dewidar O; Kawala BA; Antequera A; Tricco AC; Tovey D; Straus S; Glover R; Tufte J; Magwood O; Smith M; Ooi CP; Dion A; Goetghebeur M; Reveiz L; Negrini S; Tugwell P; Petkovic J; Welch V;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():142-153. PubMed ID: 35863618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.
Sutton A; Clowes M; Preston L; Booth A
Health Info Libr J; 2019 Sep; 36(3):202-222. PubMed ID: 31541534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Nov; 31(11):991-1003. PubMed ID: 24105473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Routine piloting in systematic reviews--a modified approach?
Long L
Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():77. PubMed ID: 25035096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Technology assessment in the Normative Aging Study.
Antczak-Bouckoms A; Tulloch JF; Klawansky S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 1864698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews.
Shimonovich M; Pearce A; Thomson H; Katikireddi SV
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):405-423. PubMed ID: 35560730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Technology assessment in the Framingham Heart Study.
Roberts MS; D'Agostino RB; Dillon M; Odell P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):156-70. PubMed ID: 1864700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Recommendations for the Conduct and Reporting of Modeling and Simulation Studies in Health Technology Assessment.
Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Balk EM; Wong JB
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(8):575-581. PubMed ID: 27750326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies.
Ramsay CR; Matowe L; Grilli R; Grimshaw JM; Thomas RE
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 15095767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic.
Schünemann HJ; Moja L
Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):4. PubMed ID: 25589399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
