These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173665)

  • 61. Moving beyond the rhetoric of patient input in health technology assessment deliberations.
    Wortley S; Wale J; Grainger D; Murphy P
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 May; 41(2):170-172. PubMed ID: 27224935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Using administrative data bases for technology assessment in health care. Results of an international survey.
    Blais R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 1864704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The method of information synthesis and its use in the assessment of health care technology.
    Marcus SH; Grover PL; Revicki DA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1987; 3(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 10285720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Consensus among experts and research synthesis. A comparison of methods.
    Wortman PM; Smyth JM; Langenbrunner JC; Yeaton WH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1998; 14(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 9509799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
    Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Using medical registries and data sets for technology assessment. An overview of seven case studies.
    Klawansky S; Antczak-Bouckoms A; Barr J; Burdick E; Roberts MS; Wyshak G; Mosteller F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 1864703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Patient Perspectives: An Integral Part of Health Technology Assessment Methodology.
    Spangler J; Huth T; Xie R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Dec; 38(1):e85. PubMed ID: 36524546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Health technology assessments by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)].
    Bernard A
    Rev Mal Respir; 2016 Dec; 33(10):835-837. PubMed ID: 27939044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Erratum to: Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Briscoe S
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Mar; 9():169. PubMed ID: 26979067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLIED METHODS - ERRATUM.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):595. PubMed ID: 30595136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A Review of Overall Survival Extrapolations of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors Used in Health Technology Assessments by the French Health Authorities - Erratum.
    Grumberg V; Roze S; Chevalier J; Borrill J; Gaudin AF; Branchoux S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 May; 38(1):e38. PubMed ID: 35577771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Health Technology Assessments for Personalised Medicines: Are Current Methodologies Suitable for the Assessment of Personalised Therapies?
    Lauks S; Gee A; Wilson LE
    Value Health; 2014 Nov; 17(7):A586. PubMed ID: 27201990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Drug Use Prevention Data, Missed Assessments and Survival Analysis.
    Bacik JM; Murphy SA; Anthony JC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1998 Oct; 33(4):573-88. PubMed ID: 26753829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Rapid Health Technology Assessment Of New Medicines: Lessons From 15 Years Experience In Scotland.
    Paterson KR
    Clin Ther; 2016 Oct; 38(10S):e13. PubMed ID: 27673610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. How to Report Systematic Review Studies; A Critical Review of Some Methodological Issues and Recommendations to Consider When Conducting These Studies.
    Amir-Behghadami M; Janati A
    Bull Emerg Trauma; 2019 Oct; 7(4):429-430. PubMed ID: 31858010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A Comparison of International Health Technology Assessment Systems - Does The Perfect System Exist?
    Kerr A; Todd C; Hebborn A; Ulyate K
    Value Health; 2014 Nov; 17(7):A441. PubMed ID: 27201183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Patient, Insuree and Public Participation in Health Technology Assessment: An International Comparison.
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C
    Value Health; 2014 Nov; 17(7):A405. PubMed ID: 27200979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effective Prioritisation of National Health Technology Assessments.
    Moran P; Harrington P; Ryan M
    Value Health; 2014 Nov; 17(7):A584-5. PubMed ID: 27201982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.