195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173728)
1. Performance of a point-of-care device in determining prothrombin time in supra-therapeutic INRs.
Hashimoto VA; De Paula EV; Colella MP; Luz Fiusa MM; Montalvao SA; Machado TF; Orsi FA; Annichino-Bizzacchi JM
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Apr; 35(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 23173728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inaccuracy of point-of-care international normalized ratio in rivaroxaban-treated patients.
Baruch L; Sherman O
Ann Pharmacother; 2013 Sep; 47(9):1210-2. PubMed ID: 24259738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of point-of-care instruments designed for monitoring oral anticoagulation with standard laboratory methods.
Gosselin R; Owings JT; White RH; Hutchinson R; Branch J; Mahackian K; Johnston M; Larkin EC
Thromb Haemost; 2000 May; 83(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 10823265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients.
Lawrie AS; Hills J; Longair I; Green L; Gardiner C; Machin SJ; Cohen H
Thromb Res; 2012 Jul; 130(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 21937093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a point-of-care device in determining prothrombin time in an anticoagulation clinic.
Colella MP; Fiusa MM; Orsi FL; de Paula EV; Annichino-Bizzacchi JM
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2012 Mar; 23(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 22246165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.
Tripodi A; Bressi C; Carpenedo M; Chantarangkul V; Clerici M; Mannucci PM
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15081563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of device evaluation for point-of-care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs.
McBane RD; Felty CL; Hartgers ML; Chaudhry R; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ
Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Feb; 80(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15704772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility, cost-effectiveness and patients' acceptance of point-of-care INR testing in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic.
Kong MC; Lim TG; Ng HJ; Chan YH; Lee LH
Ann Hematol; 2008 Nov; 87(11):905-10. PubMed ID: 18604535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
Ryan F; O'Shea S; Byrne S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. PubMed ID: 19032373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anticoagulation monitoring part 1: warfarin and parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors.
Spinler SA; Nutescu EA; Smythe MA; Wittkowsky AK
Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Jun; 39(6):1049-55. PubMed ID: 15855245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between CoaguChek S- and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Jonsson M; Hillarp A; Svensson P
Thromb Res; 2004; 114(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15306149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.
Sobieraj-Teague M; Daniel D; Farrelly B; Coghlan D; Gallus A
Thromb Res; 2009 Apr; 123(6):909-13. PubMed ID: 19042011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparative Study of Point-of-Care Prothrombin Time in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.
Okabayashi S; Ogawa S; Tanaka KA; Nishiyama T; Takeshita S; Nakayama Y; Nakajima Y; Sawa T; Mizobe T
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Aug; 32(4):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 29395816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International normalized ratio monitoring of vitamin K antagonist therapy: comparative performance of point-of-care and laboratory-derived testing.
Bonar R; Mohammed S; Favaloro EJ
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2015 Apr; 41(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 25839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of point of care coagulometers compared to reference laboratory measurements in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.
Dillinger JG; Si Moussi T; Berge N; Bal Dit Sollier C; Henry P; Drouet L
Thromb Res; 2016 Apr; 140():66-72. PubMed ID: 26901852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two point-of-care international normalized ratio devices and laboratory method.
Vazquez SR; Fleming RP; Johnson SA
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2017 Oct; 28(7):534-539. PubMed ID: 28379875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of point-of-care INR results in patients treated with dabigatran.
van Ryn J; Baruch L; Clemens A
Am J Med; 2012 Apr; 125(4):417-20. PubMed ID: 22306274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
