These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23173887)

  • 1. Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation?: Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments.
    Clark MD; Leech D; Gumber A; Moro D; Szczepura A; West N; Higgins R
    BMC Nephrol; 2012 Nov; 13():152. PubMed ID: 23173887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Community preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: a discrete choice study.
    Howard K; Jan S; Rose JM; Wong G; Irving M; Tong A; Craig JC; Chadban S; Allen RD; Cass A
    Transplantation; 2015 Mar; 99(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 25700169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient preferences for the allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation: a mixed methods study.
    Tong A; Jan S; Wong G; Craig JC; Irving M; Chadban S; Cass A; Marren N; Howard K
    BMC Nephrol; 2012 Apr; 13():18. PubMed ID: 22510248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.
    Cecka JM
    Clin Transpl; 2005; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 17424721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient and health professional preferences for organ allocation and procurement, end-of-life care and organization of care for patients with chronic kidney disease using a discrete choice experiment.
    Davison SN; Kromm SK; Currie GR
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 Jul; 25(7):2334-41. PubMed ID: 20208074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring trade-offs in nephrology: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies.
    Clark MD; Szczepura A; Gumber A; Howard K; Moro D; Morton RL
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2018 Feb; 33(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 28158746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Preferences for Disease Profiles: A Discrete Choice Experiment from a US Societal Perspective.
    Johnston KM; Audhya IF; Dunne J; Feeny D; Neumann P; Malone DC; Szabo SM; Gooch KL
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 38253973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new national allocation scheme for adult kidneys in the United Kingdom. United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority (UKTSSA) Users' Kidney Advisory Group and its Task Forces.
    Fuggle SV; Belger MA; Johnson RJ; Ray TC; Morris PJ
    Clin Transpl; 1998; ():107-13. PubMed ID: 10503089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decisional Needs of People From Minority Ethnic Groups Around Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A UK Healthcare Professionals' Perspective.
    Ahmed A; Winterbottom A; Ahmed S; Stoves J; Daga S
    Transpl Int; 2023; 36():11357. PubMed ID: 37554318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences, knowledge and beliefs about kidney allocation: qualitative findings from the UK-wide ATTOM programme.
    Gibbons A; Cinnirella M; Bayfield J; Wu D; Draper H; Johnson RJ; Tomson CR; Forsythe JL; Metcalfe W; Fogarty D; Roderick P; Ravanan R; Oniscu GC; Watson CJ; Bradley JA; Bradley C
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013896. PubMed ID: 28132010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the 1998 UK National Allocation Scheme for deceased heartbeating donor kidneys.
    Fuggle SV; Johnson RJ; Bradley JA; Rudge CJ;
    Transplantation; 2010 Feb; 89(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 20177337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining priority for liver transplantation: a comparison of cost per QALY and discrete choice experiment-generated public preferences.
    Ratcliffe J; Buxton M; Young T; Longworth L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 16466276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethnicity matching and outcomes after kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom.
    Pisavadia B; Arshad A; Chappelow I; Nightingale P; Anderson B; Nath J; Sharif A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195038. PubMed ID: 29652887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Trade-Off between Chance of Success and Urgency in Organ Allocation: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Public Preferences].
    Dao Van M; Lauerer M; Schätzlein V; Nagel E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Jul; 78(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 27438162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Renal transplantation in the UK and Republic of Ireland.
    Johnson RJ; Belger MA; Briggs JD; Fuggle SV; Morris PJ;
    Clin Transpl; 2000; ():105-13. PubMed ID: 11512304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A New UK 2006 National Kidney Allocation Scheme for deceased heart-beating donor kidneys.
    Johnson RJ; Fuggle SV; Mumford L; Bradley JA; Forsythe JL; Rudge CJ;
    Transplantation; 2010 Feb; 89(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 20177339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alignment of preferences in the treatment of multiple myeloma - a discrete choice experiment of patient, carer, physician, and nurse preferences.
    Fifer SJ; Ho KA; Lybrand S; Axford LJ; Roach S
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):546. PubMed ID: 32527324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.
    Oedingen C; Bartling T; Krauth C
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e026040. PubMed ID: 30337317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Has the UK living kidney donor population changed over time? A cross-sectional descriptive analysis of the UK living donor registry between 2006 and 2017.
    Bailey PK; Wong K; Robb M; Burnapp L; Rogers A; Courtney A; Wroe C
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e033906. PubMed ID: 32546487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.