169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2317415)
1. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.
Northridge DB; Findlay IN; Wilson J; Henderson E; Dargie HJ
Br Heart J; 1990 Feb; 63(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 2317415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A
Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.
Spahn DR; Schmid ER; Tornic M; Jenni R; von Segesser L; Turina M; Baetscher A
J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac Output Measurement in Neonates and Children Using Noninvasive Electrical Bioimpedance Compared With Standard Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Mansfield RC; Kaza N; Charalambous A; Milne AC; Sathiyamurthy S; Banerjee J
Crit Care Med; 2022 Jan; 50(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 34325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography.
Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R
Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function.
Spinale FG; Smith AC; Crawford FA
Crit Care Med; 1990 Apr; 18(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 2318052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive measure of cardiac output for porcine research.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Lab Anim; 1998 Jul; 32(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 9718481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution.
Faini A; Omboni S; Tifrea M; Bubenek S; Lazar O; Parati G
Blood Press; 2014 Apr; 23(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 23926884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic doppler imaging accurately determines cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients.
Feinberg MS; Hopkins WE; Davila-Roman VG; Barzilai B
Chest; 1995 Mar; 107(3):769-73. PubMed ID: 7874951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output measurement.
Ng HW; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM
Br J Anaesth; 1994 Jul; 73(1):119-20. PubMed ID: 8038043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs.
Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL
Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of cardiac output with the Quantascope, a novel Doppler device: comparison with thermodilution.
Cross SJ; Lee HS; Jennings K; Rawles J
Eur Heart J; 1993 Jun; 14(6):809-11. PubMed ID: 8179644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Methods for Cardiac Output: Intraoperatively Doppler-Derived Cardiac Output Measured With 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Is Not Interchangeable With Cardiac Output by Pulmonary Catheter Thermodilution.
Graeser K; Zemtsovski M; Kofoed KF; Winther-Jensen M; Nilsson JC; Kjaergaard J; Møller-Sørensen H
Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 29324489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of cardiac output in neonates supported by mechanical ventilation: measurement with thoracic electrical bioimpedance and pulsed Doppler ultrasound.
Tibballs J
J Pediatr; 1989 Apr; 114(4 Pt 1):632-5. PubMed ID: 2926576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations.
Pickett BR; Buell JC
Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(16):1354-8. PubMed ID: 1585872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
