These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2317415)
1. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance. Northridge DB; Findlay IN; Wilson J; Henderson E; Dargie HJ Br Heart J; 1990 Feb; 63(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 2317415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation. Spahn DR; Schmid ER; Tornic M; Jenni R; von Segesser L; Turina M; Baetscher A J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Engoren M; Barbee D Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac Output Measurement in Neonates and Children Using Noninvasive Electrical Bioimpedance Compared With Standard Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mansfield RC; Kaza N; Charalambous A; Milne AC; Sathiyamurthy S; Banerjee J Crit Care Med; 2022 Jan; 50(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 34325447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function. Spinale FG; Smith AC; Crawford FA Crit Care Med; 1990 Apr; 18(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 2318052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients. Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution. Faini A; Omboni S; Tifrea M; Bubenek S; Lazar O; Parati G Blood Press; 2014 Apr; 23(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 23926884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients. Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output measurement. Ng HW; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM Br J Anaesth; 1994 Jul; 73(1):119-20. PubMed ID: 8038043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs. Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of cardiac output with the Quantascope, a novel Doppler device: comparison with thermodilution. Cross SJ; Lee HS; Jennings K; Rawles J Eur Heart J; 1993 Jun; 14(6):809-11. PubMed ID: 8179644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Methods for Cardiac Output: Intraoperatively Doppler-Derived Cardiac Output Measured With 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Is Not Interchangeable With Cardiac Output by Pulmonary Catheter Thermodilution. Graeser K; Zemtsovski M; Kofoed KF; Winther-Jensen M; Nilsson JC; Kjaergaard J; Møller-Sørensen H Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 29324489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of cardiac output in neonates supported by mechanical ventilation: measurement with thoracic electrical bioimpedance and pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Tibballs J J Pediatr; 1989 Apr; 114(4 Pt 1):632-5. PubMed ID: 2926576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method. Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations. Pickett BR; Buell JC Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(16):1354-8. PubMed ID: 1585872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]