885 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23174238)
1. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.
Cascio S; Tien A; Chee W; Tan HL
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):335-8. PubMed ID: 17162086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.
Danuser H; Germann C; Pelzer N; Rühle A; Stucki P; Mattei A
BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.
Lee RS; Retik AB; Borer JG; Peters CA
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):683-7; discussion 687. PubMed ID: 16407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience.
Olsen LH; Rawashdeh YF; Jorgensen TM
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2137-41; discussion 2141. PubMed ID: 17870122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial.
Penn HA; Gatti JM; Hoestje SM; DeMarco RT; Snyder CL; Murphy JP
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):690-5. PubMed ID: 20639039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
