These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23174432)

  • 1. Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control.
    Wöstmann NM; Aichert DS; Costa A; Rubia K; Möller HJ; Ettinger U
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Feb; 81(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 23174432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and initial assessment of a new paradigm for assessing cognitive and motor inhibition: the bimodal virtual-reality Stroop.
    Henry M; Joyal CC; Nolin P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Sep; 210(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 22897988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plasticity of inhibition in older adults: retest practice and transfer effects.
    Wilkinson AJ; Yang L
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):606-15. PubMed ID: 22182362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 15111228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct aging effects for two types of inhibition in older adults: a near-infrared spectroscopy study on the Simon task and the flanker task.
    Kawai N; Kubo-Kawai N; Kubo K; Terazawa T; Masataka N
    Neuroreport; 2012 Oct; 23(14):819-24. PubMed ID: 22828408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stop signal and Conners' continuous performance tasks: test--retest reliability of two inhibition measures in ADHD children.
    Soreni N; Crosbie J; Ickowicz A; Schachar R
    J Atten Disord; 2009 Sep; 13(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 19429883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability of employee job performance ratings.
    Sturman MC; Cheramie RA; Cashen LH
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 15769237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and response inhibition: Normative data for the Victoria Stroop Test.
    Troyer AK; Leach L; Strauss E
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Mar; 13(1):20-35. PubMed ID: 16766341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within-session and between-session reproducibility of cerebral sensorimotor activation: a test--retest effect evidenced with functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Loubinoux I; Carel C; Alary F; Boulanouar K; Viallard G; Manelfe C; Rascol O; Celsis P; Chollet F
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2001 May; 21(5):592-607. PubMed ID: 11333370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heritability of Stroop and flanker performance in 12-year old children.
    Stins JF; van Baal GC; Polderman TJ; Verhulst FC; Boomsma DI
    BMC Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 5():49. PubMed ID: 15579206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Instrumental and test-retest reliability of saccadic measures.
    Klein C; Fischer B
    Biol Psychol; 2005 Mar; 68(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 15620790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brief report: manipulation of task difficulty in inhibitory control tasks.
    Lindqvist S; Thorell LB
    Child Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18608218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal task.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 16556567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saccadic performance in questionnaire-identified schizotypes over time.
    Gooding DC; Shea HB; Matts CW
    Psychiatry Res; 2005 Feb; 133(2-3):173-86. PubMed ID: 15740993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The key locus of common response inhibition network for no-go and stop signals.
    Zheng D; Oka T; Bokura H; Yamaguchi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1434-42. PubMed ID: 18303978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tourette's syndrome (TS): inhibitory performance in adults with uncomplicated TS.
    Channon S; Drury H; Martinos M; Robertson MM; Orth M; Crawford S
    Neuropsychology; 2009 May; 23(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 19413449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.