These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23175499)
1. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years. Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ; J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study. Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer. López-Regalado ML; Clavero A; Gonzalvo MC; Serrano M; Martínez L; Mozas J; Rodríguez-Serrano F; Fontes J; Castilla JA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():192-8. PubMed ID: 24798072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years. Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience]. Leniaud L; Poncelet C; Porcher R; Martin-Pont B; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Wolf JP; Sifer C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Feb; 36(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 18255330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: Should it be the rule? Clua E; Tur R; Coroleu B; Boada M; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 23069742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios. Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols. Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF. van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates. van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Land JA; Dirksen CD; Severens JL; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1669-74. PubMed ID: 17416915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome and feasibility of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy for the first and second IVF/ICSI attempts. Gremeau AS; Brugnon F; Bouraoui Z; Pekrishvili R; Janny L; Pouly JL Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jan; 160(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 22178171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Hernandez Torres E; Navarro-Espigares JL; Clavero A; López-Regalado M; Camacho-Ballesta JA; Onieva-García M; Martínez L; Castilla JA Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 25557244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012. Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]