These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23175645)

  • 41. Cassette based digital X-ray systems: evaluating the Konica Minolta Xpress CR.
    Health Devices; 2005 Nov; 34(11):365-77. PubMed ID: 16454117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quality control in diagnostic radiology--a United States perspective.
    Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Jun; 19(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 8826715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Review of acceptability criteria for X ray systems relevant for digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11487844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the acceptability of fluoroscopic systems for clinical use.
    Balter S; O'Connor U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 23204557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determination of correct AEC function with computed radiography cassettes.
    Wilkinson LE; Heggie JC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Sep; 20(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 9409020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems in Greece.
    Kalathaki M; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Tritakis P; Kalyvas N; Simantirakis G; Manousaridis G; Kaisas I; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21821614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digital autoradiography using room temperature CCD and CMOS imaging technology.
    Cabello J; Bailey A; Kitchen I; Prydderch M; Clark A; Turchetta R; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4993-5011. PubMed ID: 17671349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE.
    Mourik JE; van der Tol P; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):303-7. PubMed ID: 26535003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):168-71. PubMed ID: 15933101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Entrance surface air kerma in X-ray systems for paediatric interventional cardiology: a national survey.
    Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Valenzuela E; Vergara F; Guarda E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):107-10. PubMed ID: 25805885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography.
    Fritz S; Jones AK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Mar; 44(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24281685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.