These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2317599)

  • 1. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Feb; 24(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 2317599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1987 May; 21(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 3594015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a speech intelligibility test based on measuring speech reception thresholds in noise for English and Finnish.
    Vainio M; Suni A; Jarveläinen H; Järvikivi J; Mattila VV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1742-50. PubMed ID: 16240832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 15937409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test of Spanish sentences to measure speech intelligibility in noise conditions.
    Cervera T; González-Alvarez J
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 21416305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise.
    Middelweerd MJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):2145-7. PubMed ID: 3429736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of an automated procedure for a Dutch sentence test for the measurement of the speech reception threshold in noise.
    Terband H; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3225-34. PubMed ID: 19045806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
    Nilsson M; Soli SD; Sullivan JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1085-99. PubMed ID: 8132902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.