These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Birds as suppliers of seed dispersal in temperate ecosystems: conservation guidelines from real-world landscapes. Garcia D; Zamora R; Amico GC Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1070-9. PubMed ID: 20136873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach. Braunisch V; Segelbacher G; Hirzel AH Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3664-78. PubMed ID: 20723058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population. Pavlacky DC; Possingham HP; Lowe AJ; Prentis PJ; Green DJ; Goldizen AW J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):940-52. PubMed ID: 22489927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining measures of dispersal to identify conservation strategies in fragmented landscapes. Leidner AK; Haddad NM Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):1022-31. PubMed ID: 21848964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining and evaluating the umbrella species concept for conserving and restoring landscape connectivity. Breckheimer I; Haddad NM; Morris WF; Trainor AM; Fields WR; Jobe RT; Hudgens BR; Moody A; Walters JR Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1584-93. PubMed ID: 25115148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Replicated landscape genetic and network analyses reveal wide variation in functional connectivity for American pikas. Castillo JA; Epps CW; Jeffress MR; Ray C; Rodhouse TJ; Schwalm D Ecol Appl; 2016 Sep; 26(6):1660-1676. PubMed ID: 27755691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Carroll C; McRae BH; Brookes A Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 22010832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disrupted fine-scale population processes in fragmented landscapes despite large-scale genetic connectivity for a widespread and common cooperative breeder: the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). Harrisson KA; Pavlova A; Amos JN; Takeuchi N; Lill A; Radford JQ; Sunnucks P J Anim Ecol; 2013 Mar; 82(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 23190389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural habitat predicts functional dispersal habitat of a large carnivore: how leopards change spots. Fattebert J; Robinson HS; Balme G; Slotow R; Hunter L Ecol Appl; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1911-21. PubMed ID: 26591456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative landscape genetics of two river frog species occurring at different elevations on Mount Kilimanjaro. Zancolli G; Rödel MO; Steffan-Dewenter I; Storfer A Mol Ecol; 2014 Oct; 23(20):4989-5002. PubMed ID: 25230017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Divergent landscape effects on population connectivity in two co-occurring amphibian species. Richardson JL Mol Ecol; 2012 Sep; 21(18):4437-51. PubMed ID: 22891686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the landscape on boreal toad gene flow: does the pattern-process relationship hold true across distinct landscapes at the northern range margin? Moore JA; Tallmon DA; Nielsen J; Pyare S Mol Ecol; 2011 Dec; 20(23):4858-69. PubMed ID: 22035421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad. Stevens VM; Verkenne C; Vandewoestijne S; Wesselingh RA; Baguette M Mol Ecol; 2006 Aug; 15(9):2333-44. PubMed ID: 16842409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Landscape genetics of an endangered lemur (Propithecus tattersalli) within its entire fragmented range. Quéméré E; Crouau-Roy B; Rabarivola C; Louis EE; Chikhi L Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(8):1606-21. PubMed ID: 20345682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of multiple dispersal mechanisms and landscape structure on population clustering and connectivity in fragmented artesian spring snail populations. Worthington Wilmer J; Elkin C; Wilcox C; Murray L; Niejalke D; Possingham H Mol Ecol; 2008 Aug; 17(16):3733-51. PubMed ID: 18643884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limited ecological connectivity of an arboreal marsupial across a forest/plantation landscape despite apparent resilience to fragmentation. Lancaster ML; Taylor AC; Cooper SJ; Carthew SM Mol Ecol; 2011 Jun; 20(11):2258-71. PubMed ID: 21507094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go? Jaquiéry J; Broquet T; Hirzel AH; Yearsley J; Perrin N Mol Ecol; 2011 Feb; 20(4):692-705. PubMed ID: 21175906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Minor ES; Urban DL Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18241238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consequences of ignoring dispersal variation in network models for landscape connectivity. Sullivan LL; Michalska-Smith MJ; Sperry KP; Moeller DA; Shaw AK Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):944-954. PubMed ID: 32975336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]