These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23177002)

  • 1. Using risk maps to link land value damage and risk as basis of flexible risk management for brownfield redevelopment.
    Chen IC; Ma HW
    Chemosphere; 2013 Feb; 90(7):2101-8. PubMed ID: 23177002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty analysis of remediation cost and damaged land value for brownfield investment.
    Chen IC; Chuo YY; Ma HW
    Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 220():371-380. PubMed ID: 30590303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying a multi-criteria genetic algorithm framework for brownfield reuse optimization: improving redevelopment options based on stakeholder preferences.
    Morio M; Schädler S; Finkel M
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():331-46. PubMed ID: 24121544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eco-efficiency in contaminated land management in Finland: barriers and development needs.
    Sorvari J; Antikainen R; Kosola ML; Hokkanen P; Haavisto T
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1715-27. PubMed ID: 19201076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of receptor-specific risk distribution in the arsenic contaminated land management.
    Chen IC; Ng S; Wang GS; Ma HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov; 262():1080-90. PubMed ID: 22884730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model.
    Schädler S; Morio M; Bartke S; Rohr-Zänker R; Finkel M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):827-37. PubMed ID: 21051134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated planning and spatial evaluation of megasite remediation and reuse options.
    Schädler S; Morio M; Bartke S; Finkel M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jan; 127(1-4):88-100. PubMed ID: 21531037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A needs analysis method for land-use planning of illegal dumping sites: a case study in Aomori-Iwate, Japan.
    Ishii K; Furuichi T; Nagao Y
    Waste Manag; 2013 Feb; 33(2):445-55. PubMed ID: 23158872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of regulatory decisions for environmental protection: part II - the case-study of contaminated land management in Portugal.
    Rodrigues SM; Pereira ME; da Silva EF; Hursthouse AS; Duarte AC
    Environ Int; 2009 Jan; 35(1):214-25. PubMed ID: 18835040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of a novel decision support system for regional land use planning for brownfield land.
    Hammond EB; Coulon F; Hallett SH; Thomas R; Dick A; Hardy D; Dickens M; Washbourn E; Beriro DJ
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 349():119466. PubMed ID: 37952377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.
    Knight AT; Cowling RM; Difford M; Campbell BM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1348-58. PubMed ID: 20345404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for "gentle" remediation approaches: the European context.
    Cundy AB; Bardos RP; Church A; Puschenreiter M; Friesl-Hanl W; Müller I; Neu S; Mench M; Witters N; Vangronsveld J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():283-91. PubMed ID: 23973957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating the soil function concept into sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives.
    Volchko Y; Norrman J; Bergknut M; Rosén L; Söderqvist T
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():367-76. PubMed ID: 23994579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allocating risk capital for a brownfields redevelopment project under hydrogeological and financial uncertainty.
    Yu S; Unger AJ; Parker B; Kim T
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jun; 100():96-108. PubMed ID: 22366499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk-based economic decision analysis of remediation options at a PCE-contaminated site.
    Lemming G; Friis-Hansen P; Bjerg PL
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1169-82. PubMed ID: 20117877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative off-site impacts of ecological restoration: understanding and addressing the conflict.
    Buckley MC; Crone EE
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1118-24. PubMed ID: 18759779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Setting the most robust effluent level under severe uncertainty: application of information-gap decision theory to chemical management.
    Yokomizo H; Naito W; Tanaka Y; Kamo M
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(10):2224-9. PubMed ID: 24125713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land.
    Carlon C; Pizzol L; Critto A; Marcomini A
    Environ Int; 2008 Apr; 34(3):397-411. PubMed ID: 18031816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A decision support tool to prioritize risk management options for contaminated sites.
    Sorvari J; Seppälä J
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Mar; 408(8):1786-99. PubMed ID: 20138649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.