389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23177748)
1. Multidirectional regression (MDR)-based features for automatic voice disorder detection.
Muhammad G; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Mahmood A; Alsulaiman M
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e19-27. PubMed ID: 23177748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On combining information from modulation spectra and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for automatic detection of pathological voices.
Arias-Londoño JD; Godino-Llorente JI; Markaki M; Stylianou Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):60-9. PubMed ID: 21073260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic Voice Pathology Detection With Running Speech by Using Estimation of Auditory Spectrum and Cepstral Coefficients Based on the All-Pole Model.
Ali Z; Elamvazuthi I; Alsulaiman M; Muhammad G
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):757.e7-757.e19. PubMed ID: 26522263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and Inter-database Study for Arabic, English, and German Databases: Do Conventional Speech Features Detect Voice Pathology?
Ali Z; Alsulaiman M; Muhammad G; Elamvazuthi I; Al-Nasheri A; Mesallam TA; Farahat M; Malki KH
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):386.e1-386.e8. PubMed ID: 27745756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrimination between pathological and normal voices using GMM-SVM approach.
Wang X; Zhang J; Yan Y
J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 20137892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Voice source characterization using pitch synchronous discrete cosine transform for speaker identification.
Ramakrishnan AG; Abhiram B; Prasanna SR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):EL469-75. PubMed ID: 26093457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of Voice Pathology Detection and Classification on Different Frequency Regions Using Correlation Functions.
Al-Nasheri A; Muhammad G; Alsulaiman M; Ali Z
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 26992554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
Dejonckere P; Schoentgen J; Giordano A; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Manfredi C
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 21689056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic measurement of voice onset time using discriminative structured prediction.
Sonderegger M; Keshet J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3965-79. PubMed ID: 23231126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Investigation of Multidimensional Voice Program Parameters in Three Different Databases for Voice Pathology Detection and Classification.
Al-Nasheri A; Muhammad G; Alsulaiman M; Ali Z; Mesallam TA; Farahat M; Malki KH; Bencherif MA
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):113.e9-113.e18. PubMed ID: 27105857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Pathological Voice Using Cepstrum Vectors: A Deep Learning Approach.
Fang SH; Tsao Y; Hsiao MJ; Chen JY; Lai YH; Lin FC; Wang CT
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):634-641. PubMed ID: 29567049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of audio compression in automatic detection of voice pathologies.
Sáenz-Lechón N; Osma-Ruiz V; Godino-Llorente JI; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F; Arias-Londoño JD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Dec; 55(12):2831-5. PubMed ID: 19126465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Acoustic-Signal-Based Preventive Program for University Lecturers' Vocal Health.
Paniagua MS; Pérez CJ; Calle-Alonso F; Salazar C
J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 30072204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
