182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23179520)
1. The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer.
Kuang F; Ren J; Zhong Q; Liyuan F; Huan Y; Chen Z
Eur Radiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 23179520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of cervical cancer and benign cervical lesions at 3.0T: Comparison with routine MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Kuang F; Yan Z; Li H; Feng H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1094-9. PubMed ID: 25824638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images.
Downey K; Riches SF; Morgan VA; Giles SL; Attygalle AD; Ind TE; Barton DP; Shepherd JH; deSouza NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):314-20. PubMed ID: 23345352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging--preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient.
Matoba M; Tonami H; Kondou T; Yokota H; Higashi K; Toga H; Sakuma T
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):570-7. PubMed ID: 17400757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient with uterine cervical pathologic finding.
Lin Y; Li H; Chen Z; Ni P; Zhong Q; Huang H; Sandrasegaran K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1125-31. PubMed ID: 25905952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate the response to radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer.
Kuang F; Yan Z; Wang J; Rao Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 24512795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Erbay G; Guler OC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26919800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?
Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Duerr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 25148160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant hepatic tumors: effect of DWI techniques and calculation methods.
Kim SY; Lee SS; Park B; Kim N; Kim JK; Park SH; Byun JH; Song KJ; Koo JH; Choi EK; Lee MG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1131-8. PubMed ID: 22777895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness.
Curvo-Semedo L; Lambregts DM; Maas M; Beets GL; Caseiro-Alves F; Beets-Tan RG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 22271382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer.
Yang W; Qiang JW; Tian HP; Chen B; Wang AJ; Zhao JG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1771-1779. PubMed ID: 27859961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of standard and high B-value diffusion MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a correlation study with histological grade.
Ahn SJ; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Han MH; Chang KH; Min HS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22818788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience.
Kim JK; Kim KA; Park BW; Kim N; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 18777531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apparent diffusion coefficient of line scan diffusion image in normal prostate and prostate cancer--comparison with single-shot echo planner image.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Uchida K; Hara S; Igawa M; Kitagaki H; Maier SE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 20833498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Cheng R; Liu S; Qu F; Yin X; Wang Q; Xiao B; Ye Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 29761595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer.
Payne GS; Schmidt M; Morgan VA; Giles S; Bridges J; Ind T; DeSouza NM
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 19875159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
