BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23179602)

  • 1. Amalgamating source trees with different taxonomic levels.
    Berry V; Bininda-Emonds OR; Semple C
    Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):231-49. PubMed ID: 23179602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.
    Berry V; Semple C
    Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 16611599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.
    Ranwez V; Berry V; Criscuolo A; Fabre PH; Guillemot S; Scornavacca C; Douzery EJ
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 17918032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genus-level supertree of Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes), partitioned qualitative clade support and test of macro-evolutionary scenarios.
    Gaubert P; Denys G; Oberdorff T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Nov; 84(4):653-89. PubMed ID: 19857213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constructing rooted supertrees using distances.
    Willson SJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2004 Nov; 66(6):1755-83. PubMed ID: 15522354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness of topological supertree methods for reconciling dense incompatible data.
    Willson SJ
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 19179699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A fast algorithm to build a supertree with a set of gene trees].
    Gorbunov KIu; Liubetskiĭ VA
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2012; 46(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 22642116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
    Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using max cut to enhance rooted trees consistency.
    Snir S; Rao S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 17085842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
    Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Axiomatic opportunities and obstacles for inferring a species tree from gene trees.
    Steel M; Velasco JD
    Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):772-8. PubMed ID: 24951558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quartet MaxCut: a fast algorithm for amalgamating quartet trees.
    Snir S; Rao S
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jan; 62(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21762785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction.
    Bininda-Emonds OR; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):565-79. PubMed ID: 12116654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the ancestral compatibility of two phylogenetic trees with nested taxa.
    Llabrés M; Rocha J; Rosselló F; Valiente G
    J Math Biol; 2006 Sep; 53(3):340-64. PubMed ID: 16823581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.