These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23179751)

  • 41. A prospective, single-center, randomized study to assess whether automated coregistration of optical coherence tomography with angiography can reduce geographic miss.
    Koyama K; Fujino A; Maehara A; Yamamoto MH; Alexandru D; Jennings J; Krug P; Santiago LM; Murray M; Bongiovanni L; Lee T; Kim SY; Wang X; Lin Y; Matsumura M; Ali ZA; Sosa F; Haag E; Mintz GS; Shlofmitz RA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 30345635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improvement of determination technique for extracting centerline in coronary artery with calcification on CTA.
    Ikai A; Lee Y; Tsai DY; Yamamoto I; Matsumoto K; Kimura M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 65(9):1313-23. PubMed ID: 19828929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of IVOCT imaging of coronary artery metallic stents with neointimal coverage.
    Elahi S; Ho D; Feldman MD; Dijkstra J; Milner TE
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 31(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 25395364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stent evaluation in low-dose coronary CT angiography: effect of different iterative reconstruction settings.
    Wuest W; May MS; Scharf M; Layritz C; Eisentopf J; Ropers D; Pflederer T; Uder M; Achenbach S; Lell MM
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 24268119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The reliability of computed tomography-derived SYNTAX score measurement.
    Ugur M; Uluganyan M; Cicek G; Bozbay M; Ekmekci A; Koroglu B; Karaca G; Murat A; Tusun E; Kalaycioglu E; Uyarel H; Eren M
    Angiology; 2015 Feb; 66(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 24554424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical validation of the new T- and Y-shape models for the quantitative analysis of coronary bifurcations: an interobserver variability study.
    Tuinenburg JC; Janssen JP; Kooistra R; Koning G; Corral MD; Lansky AJ; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):E225-36. PubMed ID: 22707289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study.
    Mahnken AH; Mühlenbruch G; Seyfarth T; Flohr T; Stanzel S; Wildberger JE; Günther RW; Kuettner A
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Feb; 47(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16498931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents.
    Gomez-Lara J; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Garg S; Regar E; De Bruyne B; Windecker S; McClean D; Thuesen L; Dudek D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Morel MA; de Vries T; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 3(11):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21087756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reproducibility of semi-automatic coronary plaque quantification in coronary CT angiography with sub-mSv radiation dose.
    Øvrehus KA; Schuhbaeck A; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Nørgaard BL; Bøtker HE; Dey D
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 26712694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device.
    LaBounty TM; Kim RJ; Lin FY; Budoff MJ; Weinsaft JW; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 May; 3(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20466343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new method of three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction from X-ray angiography: validation against a virtual phantom and multislice computed tomography.
    Andriotis A; Zifan A; Gavaises M; Liatsis P; Pantos I; Theodorakakos A; Efstathopoulos EP; Katritsis D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 18098180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Total coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden assessment by CT angiography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease associated with myocardial perfusion abnormalities.
    Kishi S; Magalhães TA; Cerci RJ; Matheson MB; Vavere A; Tanami Y; Kitslaar PH; George RT; Brinker J; Miller JM; Clouse ME; Lemos PA; Niinuma H; Reiber JH; Rochitte CE; Rybicki FJ; Di Carli MF; Cox C; Lima JA; Arbab-Zadeh A
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 26817414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kumsars I; Lesiak M; Kayaert P; Dens J; Stella PR; de Winter RJ; Laak LL; Généreux P; Kaplan AV; Leon MB; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Corriere MA; Islam A; Craven TE; Conlee TD; Hurie JB; Edwards MS
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 59(5):1224-31.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24439321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.
    Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Serial coronary computed tomography angiography-verified coronary plaque progression: comparison of stented patients with or without diabetes.
    Shi R; Shi K; Yang ZG; Guo YK; Diao KY; Gao Y; Zhang Y; Huang S
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 Sep; 18(1):123. PubMed ID: 31551077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new high-definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT.
    Tanami Y; Jinzaki M; Yamada M; Imai Y; Segawa K; Kuribayashi S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 28(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 21222034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent restenosis using model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography: initial experience.
    Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Sakane H; Nakamura Y; Iida M; Baba Y; Fujioka C; Senoo A; Kitagawa T; Yamamoto H; Kihara Y; Awai K
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1082):20170598. PubMed ID: 29022741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine-Learning Approach to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: Result From the MACHINE Consortium.
    Coenen A; Kim YH; Kruk M; Tesche C; De Geer J; Kurata A; Lubbers ML; Daemen J; Itu L; Rapaka S; Sharma P; Schwemmer C; Persson A; Schoepf UJ; Kepka C; Hyun Yang D; Nieman K
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e007217. PubMed ID: 29914866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.