144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23179891)
21. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
Denost Q; Laurent C; Capdepont M; Zerbib F; Rullier E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Aug; 54(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 21730784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Functional outcomes with handsewn versus stapled anastomoses in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer.
Ramage L; Mclean P; Simillis C; Qiu S; Kontovounisios C; Tan E; Tekkis P
Updates Surg; 2018 Mar; 70(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29313248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.
Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; Perretta S; D'Ambrosio G; Lezoche E
Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 12874687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of the clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.
Tokoro T; Okuno K; Hida J; Ueda K; Yoshifuji T; Daito K; Takemoto M; Sugiura F
World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jan; 11():24. PubMed ID: 23356424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer.
Saito N; Ito M; Kobayashi A; Nishizawa Y; Kojima M; Nishizawa Y; Sugito M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3608-15. PubMed ID: 24923221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis.
Cong JC; Chen CS; Ma MX; Xia ZX; Liu DS; Zhang FY
Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 16(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 24460588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Orsenigo E; Di Palo S; Vignali A; Staudacher C
Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S117-20. PubMed ID: 18023571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Lim SW; Huh JW; Kim YJ; Kim HR
World J Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(12):2811-7. PubMed ID: 21959930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Efficacy analysis of suprapubic single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer].
Liu R; Wang Y; Xiong W; Zhang Z; Deng H; Li G
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 27353098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of recurrence following curative low anterior resection and stapled anastomoses for carcinoma of the middle third and lower rectum.
Colombo PL; Foglieni CL; Morone C
Dis Colon Rectum; 1987 Jun; 30(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 3297567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Results of treatment of distal rectal carcinoma since the introduction of total mesorectal excision: a single unit experience, 1994-2003.
Chiappa A; Biffi R; Zbar AP; Luca F; Crotti C; Bertani E; Biella F; Zampino G; Orecchia R; Fazio N; Venturino M; Crosta C; Pruneri GC; Grassi C; Andreoni B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 20(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15602647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China.
Han JG; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Zheng Y; Wang ZJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 May; 52(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 19502861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
