170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23179982)
1. In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.
Koller H; Meier O; Zenner J; Mayer M; Hitzl W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):747-58. PubMed ID: 23179982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid-long-term follow-up of operated level kinematics after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement with Bryan disc.
Li C; Yu X; Xiong Y; Yang Y; Wang F; Zhao H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Mar; 17(1):149. PubMed ID: 35264233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
Ryu WH; Kowalczyk I; Duggal N
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 23578991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].
Lou J; Liu H; Rong X; Gong Q; Song Y; Li T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 29(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26455172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.
Ma Y; Yu X; Li C; Xiong Y; Zhao H; Yang Y; Zhao D; Wang F; Qu Y; Yang J; Bi L; Yue X
Eur Spine J; 2024 Mar; 33(3):1265-1274. PubMed ID: 38015272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C.
Lou J; Li H; Rong X; Wu W; Liu H
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016; 50(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 27130391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the deviated center of rotation on the range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty -an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.
Yan K; Shi Z; He D; Liu B; Xiao B; Wang Q; Tian W
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Feb; 24(1):88. PubMed ID: 36726119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sagittal alignment after single cervical disc arthroplasty.
Guérin P; Obeid I; Gille O; Bourghli A; Luc S; Pointillart V; Vital JM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Feb; 25(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 22124426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion.
Li J; Liang L; Ye XF; Qi M; Chen HJ; Yuan W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Oct; 22(10):2303-9. PubMed ID: 23877109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis.
Miao J; Yu F; Shen Y; He N; Kuang Y; Wang X; Chen D
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):878-83. PubMed ID: 24095101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The move-C cervical artificial disc can restore intact range of motion and 3-D kinematics.
Vogt M; Zengerle L; Jonas R; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 37660895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.
Lou J; Li Y; Wang B; Meng Y; Wu T; Liu H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(41):e8291. PubMed ID: 29019902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical disc replacement with a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of endplate.
Lou J; Li Y; Wang B; Meng Y; Gong Q; Liu H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 13(1):41. PubMed ID: 29482611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
