These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23180807)

  • 21. Efficacy, effectiveness, variations, and quality. Boundary-crossing research.
    Brook RH; Lohr KN
    Med Care; 1985 May; 23(5):710-22. PubMed ID: 3892183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative-effectiveness research in cataract and refractive surgery: the CATT call.
    Dupps WJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1569-70. PubMed ID: 21855755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials.
    Lauer MS
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(25):3051-3. PubMed ID: 23055180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating the health effects of social interventions.
    Thomson H; Hoskins R; Petticrew M; Ogilvie D; Craig N; Quinn T; Lindsay G
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7434):282-5. PubMed ID: 14751903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ethical issues in administrative continuous improvement. Applying the concept of prior notification to the conduct of firm trials.
    Goldberg HI
    Med Care; 1990 Sep; 28(9):822-33. PubMed ID: 2205768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies.
    Krull JL; MacKinnon DP
    Eval Rev; 1999 Aug; 23(4):418-44. PubMed ID: 10558394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metabias: a challenge for comparative effectiveness research.
    Goodman S; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 21727295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: what is Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and why is it important?
    Yu JB; Lloyd S; Decker RH; Wilson LD; Park HS
    Curr Probl Cancer; 2012; 36(4):208-15. PubMed ID: 22481005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Both clinical epidemiology and population health perspectives can define the role of health care in reducing health disparities.
    Anderson GM; Bronskill SE; Mustard CA; Culyer A; Alter DA; Manuel DG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):757-62. PubMed ID: 16018910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comments regarding 'Assessing the Quality of Surgical Care in Vascular Surgery; Moving from Outcome Towards Structural and Process Measures'.
    Earnshaw JJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Dec; 40(6):708. PubMed ID: 20696600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ISPOR Health Policy Council proposed Good Research Practices for comparative effectiveness research: benefit or harm?
    Stürmer T; Carey T; Poole C
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1042-3. PubMed ID: 19818061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Health services research: reporting on studies using secondary data sources.
    Huston P; Naylor CD
    CMAJ; 1996 Dec; 155(12):1697-709. PubMed ID: 8976336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.
    Peduzzi P; Kyriakides T; O'Connor TZ; Guarino P; Warren SR; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. PubMed ID: 21184867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.
    Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating healthcare systems.
    NT Learn Curve; 1998 Oct; 2(8):9-13. PubMed ID: 10067542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of controls in clinical trials.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):250-1. PubMed ID: 22284295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.
    Bellows BK; Biskupiak J
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2011; 25(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21882980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the quality of surgical care in vascular surgery; moving from outcome towards structural and process measures.
    Ploeg AJ; Flu HC; Lardenoye JH; Hamming JF; Breslau PJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Dec; 40(6):696-707. PubMed ID: 20889355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data.
    Vickers AJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(14):1134; author reply 1134-5. PubMed ID: 21690487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.