These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Has the time come for preprints in biology? Bhalla N Mol Biol Cell; 2016 Apr; 27(8):1185-7. PubMed ID: 27079652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts. Abby M; Massey MD; Galandiuk S; Polk HC JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 8015116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls. Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Online submission of manuscripts for "The Orthopedist."]. Orthopade; 2012 Oct; 41(10):799. PubMed ID: 23052845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing]. Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [More rigorous requirements of openness concerning clinical trials. Only manuscripts with all data freely accessible to researchers will be accepted by leading medical journals]. Milerad J Lakartidningen; 2001 Oct; 98(43):4692. PubMed ID: 11715243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Getting published in peer-reviewed journals. Dimitroulis G Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1342-5. PubMed ID: 22142552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biology of the Cell: serving the cell biology community. Galli T Biol Cell; 2009 Jan; 101(1):e1-2. PubMed ID: 19093912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Avoiding common problems during online submission of manuscripts. Welch SJ Chest; 2007 May; 131(5):1591-4. PubMed ID: 17494812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dealing with Consequences of Irreproducibility and Modifying the Published Literature: Retractions versus Revisions. Glass DJ; Flier JS Cell Metab; 2017 Nov; 26(5):695-696. PubMed ID: 29117541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Change to Open Peer Commentary format. Perlovsky L; Duermeijer C Phys Life Rev; 2010 Mar; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 20374915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary on "review criteria for research manuscripts". Colliver JA Teach Learn Med; 2002; 14(2):75-6. PubMed ID: 12058549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication. Dowd SB; McElveny C Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform]. Thörn A Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]