186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23181451)
1. Risk factors associated with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: can nerve-sparing surgery increase the risk?
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Christensen IJ; Toft BG; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Feb; 48(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 23181451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer at Rigshospitalet 1995-2011 - an analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Røder MA
Dan Med J; 2013 Dec; 60(12):B4752. PubMed ID: 24355454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Gillitzer R; Thüroff C; Fandel T; Thomas C; Thüroff JW; Brenner W; Wiesner C; Jones J; Hansen T; Hampel C
BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):755-759. PubMed ID: 20880193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Graefen M; Haese A; Pichlmeier U; Hammerer PG; Noldus J; Butz K; Erbersdobler A; Henke RP; Michl U; Fernandez S; Huland H
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):857-63. PubMed ID: 11176486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.
Gacci M; Simonato A; Lanciotti M; Ennas M; Varca V; Maffezzini M; Imbimbo C; Gontero P; Schiavina R; Carini M; Martorana G; Nicita G; Mirone V; Carmignani G
Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23735440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of nerve sparing on incidence and location of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy.
Moore BM; Savdie R; PeBenito RA; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Delprado W; Rasiah KK; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21711436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure.
Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; Graefen M; Erbersdobler A; Haese A; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 15661411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of active surveillance on pathology and nerve sparing status.
Sussman R; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Meraney A; Kesler SS; Wagner JR
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7299-304. PubMed ID: 24978361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
