333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23182386)
1. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants.
Elias CN; Rocha FA; Nascimento AL; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():169-80. PubMed ID: 23182386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16584413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device.
Menicucci G; Pachie E; Lorenzetti M; Migliaretti G; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 22930768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique.
Tabassum A; Walboomers XF; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
J Dent Res; 2010 Jun; 89(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 20212102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary Stability of a Hybrid Implant Compared with Tapered and Cylindrical Implants in an Ex Vivo Model.
Toyoshima T; Tanaka H; Ayukawa Y; Howashi M; Masuzaki T; Kiyosue T; Koyano K; Nakamura S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):950-6. PubMed ID: 24506148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of factors related to implant stability detected by wireless resonance frequency analysis device.
Ohta K; Takechi M; Minami M; Shigeishi H; Hiraoka M; Nishimura M; Kamata N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 37(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20002529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of underpreparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: an in vitro study.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1084-8. PubMed ID: 25861691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model.
Beer A; Gahleitner A; Holm A; Birkfellner W; Homolka P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17224030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of flute shape and thread profile on the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants.
Wu SW; Lee CC; Fu PY; Lin SC
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 22041130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.
Falco A; Berardini M; Trisi P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):824-830. PubMed ID: 30024998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
