334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23182386)
21. Heat generation during implant placement in low-density bone: effect of surgical technique, insertion torque and implant macro design.
Marković A; Mišić T; Miličić B; Calvo-Guirado JL; Aleksić Z; Ðinić A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):798-805. PubMed ID: 22469169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of implant design on initial stability of tapered implants.
Chong L; Khocht A; Suzuki JB; Gaughan J
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 19579524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: an experimental study in dogs.
Campos FE; Gomes JB; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Suzuki M; Witek L; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):e43-50. PubMed ID: 22182660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integrative Performance Analysis of a Novel Bone Level Tapered Implant.
Dard M; Kuehne S; Obrecht M; Grandin M; Helfenstein J; Pippenger BE
Adv Dent Res; 2016 Mar; 28(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 26927485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.
Lachmann S; Laval JY; Axmann D; Weber H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 21483888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Histological evaluation of oral implants inserted with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 17517059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study.
Alghamdi H; Anand PS; Anil S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e506-12. PubMed ID: 22117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implants inserted with low insertion torque values for intraoral welded full-arch prosthesis: 1-year follow-up.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e39-45. PubMed ID: 21453397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative biomechanical analysis of the influence of the cortical bone and implant length on primary stability.
Hong J; Lim YJ; Park SO
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1193-7. PubMed ID: 22092387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relationship between the CT Value and Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Recipient Sites and Primary Implant Stability with Comparison of Different Implant Types.
Howashi M; Tsukiyama Y; Ayukawa Y; Isoda-Akizuki K; Kihara M; Imai Y; Sogo M; Koyano K
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 25181581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In Vitro Evaluation of the Primary Stability of Short Implants in Different Surgical Techniques.
Kucukguven MB; Topaloglu G; Isıkhan SY; Tosun E; Saysel MY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):700-706. PubMed ID: 32724921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Peri-implant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: a minipig study.
Neugebauer J; Traini T; Thams U; Piattelli A; Zöller JE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 16460238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the primary stabilities of conical and cylindrical endosseous dental implants: an in-vitro study.
Aleo E; Varvara G; Scarano A; Sinjari B; Murmura G
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2012; 26(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 22475100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel implant design for initial stability of dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets: a preliminary study.
Levin L; Frankenthal S; Zigdon H; Suzuki M; Coelho PG
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):302-5. PubMed ID: 22814554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Self-cutting blades and their influence on primary stability of tapered dental implants in a simulated low-density bone model: a laboratory study.
Kim DR; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Kim SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 21439865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study.
Trisi P; De Benedittis S; Perfetti G; Berardi D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21087320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
