BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23182603)

  • 1. Fast opposite weight learning rules with application in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Saki F; Tahmasbi A; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Shokouhi SB
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Jan; 43(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23182603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of benign and malignant masses based on Zernike moments.
    Tahmasbi A; Saki F; Shokouhi SB
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Aug; 41(8):726-35. PubMed ID: 21722886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of mammographic masses using generalized dynamic fuzzy neural networks.
    Lim WK; Er MJ
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1288-95. PubMed ID: 15191321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
    Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier.
    Delogu P; Evelina Fantacci M; Kasae P; Retico A
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1479-91. PubMed ID: 17383623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieval boosted computer-aided diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications for breast cancer.
    Jing H; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):676-85. PubMed ID: 22320777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the Mann-Whitney statistical test for feature selection: an approach in breast cancer diagnosis on mammography.
    Pérez NP; Guevara López MA; Silva A; Ramos I
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jan; 63(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 25555756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography.
    Sampat MP; Bovik AC; Whitman GJ; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2110-23. PubMed ID: 18561687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A CADx scheme for mammography empowered with topological information from clustered microcalcifications' atlases.
    Andreadis II; Spyrou GM; Nikita KS
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 25073178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information.
    Freixenet J; Oliver A; Martí R; Lladó X; Pont J; Pérez E; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1840-53. PubMed ID: 18561659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear and neural models for classifying breast masses.
    Fogel DB; Wasson EC; Boughton EM; Porto VW; Angeline PJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):485-8. PubMed ID: 9735913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized-aid diagnosis of breast mass using ultrasound image.
    Tian JW; Sun LT; Guo YH; Cheng HD; Zhang YT
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3158-64. PubMed ID: 17879777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and Classification of Mass Lesions Based on Expert Knowledge Using Mammographic Analysis.
    Arzehgar A; Khalilzadeh MM; Varshoei F
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 31975666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
    Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrieval-based computer-aided diagnosis system for the characterization of liver lesions in CT scans.
    Dankerl P; Cavallaro A; Tsymbal A; Costa MJ; Suehling M; Janka R; Uder M; Hammon M
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1526-34. PubMed ID: 24200479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.