These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23183349)

  • 41. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
    Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
    Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Importance of contractile reserve for CRT.
    Lim P; Bars C; Mitchell-Heggs L; Roiron C; Elbaz N; Hamdaoui B; Lellouche N; Dubois-Randé JL; Guéret P
    Europace; 2007 Sep; 9(9):739-43. PubMed ID: 17573360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Absence of left ventricular apical rocking and atrial-ventricular dyssynchrony predicts non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Tournoux F; Singh JP; Chan RC; Chen-Tournoux A; McCarty D; Manzke R; Ruskin JN; Semigran M; Heist EK; Moore S; Picard MH; Weyman AE
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 13(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 21921079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship between acute improvement in left ventricular function to 6-month outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Pires LA; Ghio S; Chung ES; Tavazzi L; Abraham WT; Gerritse B
    Congest Heart Fail; 2011; 17(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 21449994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stroke work or systolic dP/dtmax to evaluate acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: are they interchangeable?
    de Roest G; Knaapen P; Götte M; Hendriks T; Allaart C; de Cock C; van Rossum A
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2009 Jul; 11(7):706-8. PubMed ID: 19553399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrial pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Gold MR; Niazi I; Giudici M; Leman RB; Sturdivant JL; Kim MH; Waggoner AD; Ding J; Arcot-Krishnamurthy S; Daum D; Yu Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Aug; 20(8):894-900. PubMed ID: 19302480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Diastolic filling pattern and left ventricular diameter predict response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
    Gradaus R; Stuckenborg V; Löher A; Köbe J; Reinke F; Gunia S; Vahlhaus C; Breithardt G; Bruch C
    Heart; 2008 Aug; 94(8):1026-31. PubMed ID: 17984216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Extrasystolic stimulation with bi-ventricular pacing: an acute haemodynamic evaluation.
    Stegemann B; Mihalcz A; Földesi C; Vatasescu R; Kardos A; Török Z; Splett V; Cornelussen R; Rudas L; Szili-Török T
    Europace; 2011 Nov; 13(11):1591-6. PubMed ID: 21712265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cardiac resynchronization therapy beyond nominal settings: who needs individual programming of the atrioventricular and interventricular delay?
    Bogaard MD; Meine M; Tuinenburg AE; Maskara B; Loh P; Doevendans PA
    Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1746-53. PubMed ID: 22753868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Extraordinarily favorable left ventricular reverse remodeling through long-term cardiac resynchronization: super-response to cardiac resynchronization.
    Çelebi Ö; Knaus T; Blaschke F; Habedank D; Döhner W; Nitardy A; Stockburger M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jul; 35(7):870-6. PubMed ID: 22553930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Three years of cardiac resynchronization therapy: could superior benefits be obtained in patients with heart failure and narrow QRS?
    Gasparini M; Regoli F; Galimberti P; Ceriotti C; Bonadies M; Mangiavacchi M; Andreuzzi B; Bragato R; Pini D; Klersy C; Gronda E
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S34-9. PubMed ID: 17302713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effective prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a novel program of gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.
    Nakamura K; Takami M; Shimabukuro M; Maesato A; Chinen I; Ishigaki S; Higa S; Keida T; Masuzaki H
    Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1731-7. PubMed ID: 21873328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome.
    Tournoux FB; Alabiad C; Fan D; Chen AA; Chaput M; Heist EK; Mela T; Mansour M; Reddy V; Ruskin JN; Picard MH; Singh JP
    Eur Heart J; 2007 May; 28(9):1143-8. PubMed ID: 17449877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Feasibility, safety, and mid-term efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe heart failure and ventricular conduction delay: Chulalongkorn experience.
    Sunsaneewitayakul B; Sitthisook S; Sangwatanaroj S; Prechawat S; Songmuang SB
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jul; 90(7):1458-66. PubMed ID: 17710992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of long-term resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling in pacemaker patients upgraded to biventricular devices.
    Vatankulu MA; Goktekin O; Kaya MG; Ayhan S; Kucukdurmaz Z; Sutton R; Henein M
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(9):1280-4. PubMed ID: 19406272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Non-invasive hemodynamic analysis in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients wearing quadripolar left ventricular leads: the importance of pacing electrode selection.
    Santini L; Legramante J; Condemi F; Santucci L; Panattoni M; Crobeddu P; Sergi D; Forleo G; Romeo F
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2014 Dec; 62(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 25275712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Echocardiographic prediction of long-term response to biventricular pacemaker in severe heart failure.
    Oguz E; Dagdeviren B; Bilsel T; Akdemir O; Erdinler I; Akyol A; Ulufer T; Tezel T; Gurkan K
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2002 Jan; 4(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 11812668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study.
    Umar F; Taylor RJ; Stegemann B; Marshall H; Flannigan S; Lencioni M; De Bono J; Griffith M; Leyva F
    Europace; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26718535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Usefulness of a novel "response score" to predict hemodynamic and clinical outcome from cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Heist EK; Taub C; Fan D; Arzola-Castaner D; Alabiad CR; Reddy VY; Mansour M; Mela T; Picard MH; Ruskin JN; Singh JP
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 97(12):1732-6. PubMed ID: 16765123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.