These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23184064)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.
    Kumar I; Singh V; Singh A; Arora V; Bajaj A
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 23184064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    Singh V; Kumar I; Bhagol A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures.
    Zhan S; Jiang Y; Cheng Z; Ye J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2094-7. PubMed ID: 25304139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of 2.0 mm locking plate system vs 2.0 mm non-locking plate system for mandibular angle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.
    Yang L; Patil PM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 19(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 25753869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures.
    Collins CP; Pirinjian-Leonard G; Tolas A; Alcalde R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 62(11):1392-5. PubMed ID: 15510361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
    Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.
    Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of nonlocking plates and locking plates for intraarticular calcaneal fracture.
    Chen K; Zhang H; Wang G; Cheng Y; Qian Z; Yang H
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1298-302. PubMed ID: 25125513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.
    Madsen MJ; McDaniel CA; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18848096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of Mandibular Fractures Using Locking and Nonlocking Miniplates.
    Wusiman P; Tayie A; Ling W; Moming A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):448-452. PubMed ID: 30640857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Miniplate fixation of fractures of the symphyseal and parasymphyseal regions of the mandible: a review of 218 patients.
    Lee T; Sawhney R; Ducic Y
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2013 Mar; 15(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 23303108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of 2.3 mm locking plate system vs conventional 2.0 mm non locking plate system for mandibular condyle fracture fixation: a seven year retrospective study.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wu RH; Zhuang QW; Gu QP; Meng J
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015; 19(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 25807421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional versus 3-dimensional miniplate in management of mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    Singh V; Puri P; Arya S; Malik S; Bhagol A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):450-5. PubMed ID: 22647925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.
    Aggarwal S; Singh M; Modi P; Walia E; Aggarwal R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 28785906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locking Plate System Versus Standard Plate Fixation in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Wusiman P; Tuerxun J; Yaolidaxi B; Moming A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 28(6):1456-1461. PubMed ID: 28708651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model.
    Poon CC; Verco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 23374732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
    Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fixation of mandibular osteotomies: comparison of locking and nonlocking hardware.
    Kim Y; Smith J; Sercarz JA; Head C; Abemayor E; Blackwell KE
    Head Neck; 2007 May; 29(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 17252590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of locking and nonlocking plates in the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures.
    Seemann R; Frerich B; Müller S; Koenke R; Ploder O; Schicho K; Piffko J; Poeschl P; Wagner A; Wanschitz F; Krennmair G; Ewers R; Klug C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 19574070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery.
    Ellis E; Graham J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jun; 60(6):642-5; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 12022099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.