249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23184166)
1. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Silva IM; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 23184166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An
Patrick S; Birur NP; Gurushanth K; Raghavan AS; Gurudath S
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 28393820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.
Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Pacifici A; Pacifici L; Barbato E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 23294461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
Sennerby L; Andersson P; Pagliani L; Giani C; Moretti G; Molinari M; Motroni A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 23581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessments of jaw bone density at implant sites using 3D cone-beam computed tomography.
Hao Y; Zhao W; Wang Y; Yu J; Zou D
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 24867520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparative Study of Multidetector Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, and Computed Microtomography on Trabecular Bone Structures in the Human Mandible: An Ex Vivo Study.
Sarmento VA; de Oliveira Gonzalez TFL; Lopes RT; Novaes M; Borges SM; Rubira-Bullen IRF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):552-556. PubMed ID: 34270480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative Assessment of Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in evaluating Bone Density at Posterior Mandibular Implant Site.
Dahiya K; Kumar N; Bajaj P; Sharma A; Sikka R; Dahiya S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 29728548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Low Bone Density Predictability of CBCT and Its Relation to Primary Stability of Tapered Implant Design: A Pilot Study.
Lee SH; Yun PY; Yi YJ; Kim YK; Lee HJ; Jo DW
J Oral Implantol; 2023 Oct; 49(5):556-563. PubMed ID: 35881816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT.
Loubele M; Guerrero ME; Jacobs R; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):446-54. PubMed ID: 17622012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography.
Aranyarachkul P; Caruso J; Gantes B; Schulz E; Riggs M; Dus I; Yamada JM; Crigger M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 15973953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
