These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23184184)

  • 1. Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Thaler M; Hartmann S; Gstöttner M; Lechner R; Gabl M; Bach C
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):759-65. PubMed ID: 23184184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions.
    Dong L; Tan MS; Yan QH; Yi P; Yang F; Tang XS; Hao QY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan; 128(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 25591562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrepancy between cervical disc prostheses and anatomical cervical dimensions.
    Karaca S; Akpolat AO; Oztermeli A; Erdem MN; Aydogan M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Oct; 50(5):544-547. PubMed ID: 27776930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.
    Gstoettner M; Heider D; Liebensteiner M; Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1470-5. PubMed ID: 18791748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical Footprint Anthropometry in Indian Population: Implications on Design of Artificial Disc Replacement Devices.
    Kulkarni AG; Patil VM; Bangalore SK; Saraf A
    Asian Spine J; 2016 Feb; 10(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 26949454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China.
    Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Pan S; Zhou F; Liu Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26751058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphological studies of cartilage endplates in subaxial cervical region.
    Zhao S; Hao D; Jiang Y; Huang D; Ge C; Feng H
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2218-22. PubMed ID: 26611364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement.
    Cardoso MJ; Rosner MK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E19. PubMed ID: 20568935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis.
    Yu CC; Liu P; Huang DG; Jiang YH; Feng H; Hao DJ
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1384-1391. PubMed ID: 27345748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices.
    Ryu KS; Park CK; Jun SC; Huh HY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20809721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematics of cervical segments C5/C6 in axial rotation before and after total disc arthroplasty.
    Wachowski MM; Weiland J; Wagner M; Gezzi R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2425-2433. PubMed ID: 28378073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant.
    Li Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Tyagi R; Zhang G; Liu W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1173-E1181. PubMed ID: 28198781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Dryer RG; Gornet MF; McConnell J; Hodges SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 28387616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.
    Jin YJ; Park SB; Kim MJ; Kim KJ; Kim HJ
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.
    Pickett GE; Rouleau JP; Duggal N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep; 30(17):1949-54. PubMed ID: 16135984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
    Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.
    Zeng J; Liu H; Rong X; Wang B; Yang Y; Gao X; Wu T; Hong Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 30086733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
    Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.