196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23184267)
1. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.
Torabi R; Hsu CH; Patel PN; Dave H; Bouton ME; Komenaka IK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Mar; 398(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23184267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.
Jia H; Jia W; Yang Y; Li S; Feng H; Liu J; Rao N; Jin L; Wu J; Gu R; Zhu L; Chen K; Deng H; Zeng Y; Liu Q; Song E; Su F
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 12():289. PubMed ID: 25241216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.
Leong C; Boyages J; Jayasinghe UW; Bilous M; Ung O; Chua B; Salisbury E; Wong AY
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1823-32. PubMed ID: 15112262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.
Schnitt SJ; Abner A; Gelman R; Connolly JL; Recht A; Duda RB; Eberlein TJ; Mayzel K; Silver B; Harris JR
Cancer; 1994 Sep; 74(6):1746-51. PubMed ID: 8082077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation.
Smitt MC; Nowels K; Carlson RW; Jeffrey SS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 14575828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive factors associated with involved margins in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by breast-conserving therapy.
Davoine E; Dion L; Nyangoh Timoh K; Beraud E; Tas P; Tavenard A; Laviolle B; Perrin C; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 48(7):467-472. PubMed ID: 31207391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; McCready DR; Escallon J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29525464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term results of breast conserving surgery for stages I and II breast cancer: experiences at Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases.
Komoike Y; Motomura K; Inaji H; Kasugai T; Nose T; Koizumi M; Koyama H
Breast Cancer; 2002; 9(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 12185337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extent of margin involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and extensive intraductal component predict for residual disease after wide local excision for breast cancer.
Alrahbi S; Chan PM; Ho BC; Seah MD; Chen JJ; Tan EY
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 25576998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of surgical margins with local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lin J; Lin KJ; Wang YF; Huang LH; Chen SL; Chen DR
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):451. PubMed ID: 32434493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: Comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL).
Niinikoski L; Hukkinen K; Leidenius MHK; Vaara P; Voynov A; Heikkilä P; Mattson J; Meretoja TJ
Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():93-101. PubMed ID: 31362135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Involved margins after lumpectomy for breast cancer: Always to be re-excised?
Sorrentino L; Agozzino M; Albasini S; Bossi D; Mazzucchelli S; Vanna R; Papadopoulou O; Villani L; Corsi F
Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():141-146. PubMed ID: 31500779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the breast predicts both successful breast-conserving surgery and decreased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.
Ishitobi M; Komoike Y; Motomura K; Koyama H; Inaji H
Breast J; 2010; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19929889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Gage I; Schnitt SJ; Nixon AJ; Silver B; Recht A; Troyan SL; Eberlein T; Love SM; Gelman R; Harris JR; Connolly JL
Cancer; 1996 Nov; 78(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 8909312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
