256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23185070)
1. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of dose reduction using digital luminescence radiography for lateral skull radiography.
Seifert H; Kubale R; Hagen T; Kramann B; Leetz HK
Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):311-7. PubMed ID: 8665130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should radiologists image and report sacroiliac joints in patients referred for examination of the lumbar spine?
Matthews IP; Yates D
Lancet; 1999 Aug; 354(9177):483-4. PubMed ID: 10465177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Film-screen digital radiography.
Schwenker RP; Eger H
Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the image quality of conventional and digital radiography in lizards. Mammography technique versus digital detector system].
Bochmann M; Ludewig E; Pees M
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 22143664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
