These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23185255)

  • 1. Hidden epistastic interactions can favour the evolution of sex and recombination.
    Peck JR; Waxman D; Welch JJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48382. PubMed ID: 23185255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Otto SP
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.
    Lohaus R; Burch CL; Azevedo RB
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S142-57. PubMed ID: 20421324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
    Otto SP; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.
    Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1990 Jun; 55(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 2394378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.
    Desai MM; Weissman D; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17720923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
    MacCarthy T; Bergman A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis.
    Gandon S; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1835-53. PubMed ID: 17277371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex and deleterious mutations.
    Gordo I; Campos PR
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):621-6. PubMed ID: 18493076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
    Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why have sex? The population genetics of sex and recombination.
    Otto SP; Gerstein AC
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2006 Aug; 34(Pt 4):519-22. PubMed ID: 16856849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidimensional epistasis and the transitory advantage of sex.
    Nowak S; Neidhart J; Szendro IG; Krug J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Sep; 10(9):e1003836. PubMed ID: 25232825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.
    Weinreich DM; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Muller's ratchet, epistasis and mutation effects.
    Butcher D
    Genetics; 1995 Sep; 141(1):431-7. PubMed ID: 8536988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations.
    West SA; Peters AD; Barton NH
    Genetics; 1998 May; 149(1):435-44. PubMed ID: 9584115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The decline in fitness with inbreeding: evidence for negative dominance-by-dominance epistasis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 26709722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
    Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite populations, finite resources, and the evolutionary maintenance of genetic recombination.
    Ackerman S; Kermany AR; Hickey DA
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S135-41. PubMed ID: 20421323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination.
    Kouyos RD; Silander OK; Bonhoeffer S
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2007 Jun; 22(6):308-15. PubMed ID: 17337087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination.
    Kouyos RD; Otto SP; Bonhoeffer S
    Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 16547114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.