These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2318589)

  • 1. Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Effect of stimulus field and central scotoma.
    Sakaue H; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Hirose T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 2318589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tsukada T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Jun; 29(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 3372166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. III. Effect of stimulus size and localization.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Dec; 64(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 3811882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pattern electroretinography and pattern visual evoked potentials in maculopathy: a comparison with sensory tests].
    Niermann F; Lorenz R; Heider W
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 2722101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Transient and steady-state electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials to pattern and uniform-field stimulation in humans].
    Nakayama M
    Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 1994 Jul; 85(7):225-34. PubMed ID: 8070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata.
    Junghardt A; Wildberger H; Robert Y; Török B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 8334929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings.
    Hoffmann MB; Flechner JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 18054278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.
    Colotto A; Falsini B; Salgarello T; Iarossi G; Galan ME; Scullica L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 10892864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern reversal VER as a tool for evaluating unbalanced visual inputs between the two eyes.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T; Uemura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1988; 32(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 3411817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Hoffmann MB; Seufert PS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Motion-onset visually evoked potential with nasal and temporal half- and full-field stimulation].
    Göpfert E; Krug S; Orban D
    Biomed Biochim Acta; 1991; 50(9):1135-40. PubMed ID: 1796904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul; 69(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 3168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RP cone-rod degeneration.
    Heckenlively JR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1987; 85():438-70. PubMed ID: 3447340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-linearities in the focal ERG evoked by pattern and uniform-field stimulation. Their variation in retinal and optic nerve dysfunction.
    Porciatti V
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 Aug; 28(8):1306-13. PubMed ID: 3610549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings.
    Brecelj J; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 9562544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective loss of an oscillatory component from temporal retinal multifocal ERG responses in glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Bearse MA; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2638-47. PubMed ID: 12147597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pattern electroretinography of larger stimulus field size and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with Stargardt disease.
    Lenassi E; Jarc-Vidmar M; Glavac D; Hawlina M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 93(12):1600-5. PubMed ID: 19628494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between visual field size and electroretinogram amplitude in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Sandberg MA; Weigel-DiFranco C; Rosner B; Berson EL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 8675413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flicker-evoked changes in human optic nerve blood flow: relationship with retinal neural activity.
    Falsini B; Riva CE; Logean E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(7):2309-16. PubMed ID: 12091432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pattern and light electroretinograms in branch occlusions of the central retinal artery].
    Vomberg HE; Papst N; Heider W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Jun; 184(6):560-2. PubMed ID: 6482278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.