125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2318590)
1. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma.
Chauhan BC; Drance SM; Douglas GR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 2318590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.
Flammer J; Drance SM; Augustiny L; Funkhouser A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Feb; 26(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 3972500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detectability of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Octopus automatic perimeter. A comparison between program G-1 and programs 31 and 32 and their combinations].
Gloor B; Gloor E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Jan; 188(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3754292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients.
Werner EB; Petrig B; Krupin T; Bishop KI
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 30(6):1083-9. PubMed ID: 2732022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlations between morphologic measurements of the optic disc using planimetric tests and changes in the visual field in patients with glaucoma].
Szelepin L; Cwirko M; Nizankowska MH; Koziorowska M
Klin Oczna; 1997; 99(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 9379662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Measuring visual field loss by automated perimetry in chronic glaucoma stabilized by trabeculectomy].
Boissonnot M; Hirsch AL; Rovira JC; Risse JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1992; 15(12):645-50. PubMed ID: 1299676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of static quantitative automated perimetry in the early diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Shen ZM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2507256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
