These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Who is wise enough to decide who dies? Boyle JF Internist; 1988 Apr; 29(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 10287123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Where do you stand on euthanasia? Haddad AM RN; 1991 Apr; 54(4):38-40, 43. PubMed ID: 2031136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die. Crisostomo JP; David CH; Mesina DG; Pio de Roda AZ; Tankiang SY Philipp Law J; 1980 Sep; 55(3rd Quarter):338-82. PubMed ID: 16047423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Whose right to die? The Supreme Court will wrestle with the ultimate question. Sanders AL Time; 1989 Dec; 134(24):80. PubMed ID: 10296083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Euthanasia in Maryland: the right to die with dignity? Dailey ML J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():297-317. PubMed ID: 10313058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician-assisted suicide: a "right" reserved for only the competent? Donahue JW Vt Law Rev; 1995; 19():795-842. PubMed ID: 16086485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues. Ikuta SS Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Love and let die. Painton P; Taylor E Time; 1990 Mar; 135(12):62-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10104321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan. Gasner MR N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Should doctors kill? Watkin B Nurs Mirror; 1975 Dec; 141(24):39. PubMed ID: 11660900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence. Roach CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decisions at the end-of-life: lessons from America. Tan SY Hawaii Med J; 1995 Apr; 54(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 7601680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues at the end of life. Young EW Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Right to die: an update. Sherman T J Healthc Prot Manage; 1987; 3(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 10281323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Past and present. Closing the circle on the right to die. Linenthal AJ Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1993; 56(1):46. PubMed ID: 8434045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill? Rizzo RF N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment. Martino M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]