38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23186564)
1. A finite element analysis of novel vented dental abutment geometries for cement-retained crown restorations.
Rodriguez LC; Saba JN; Meyer CA; Chung KH; Wadhwani C; Rodrigues DC
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2016 Nov; 2(2):136-145. PubMed ID: 29744160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Printed abutment model to limit residual cement: A dental technique.
Ryser AS; Sabol JV; Handel S
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38054395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Pin Retained in the Body Nineteen Years and Then Discharged.
West J Med Surg; 1840 Nov; 2(5):402. PubMed ID: 38207400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of crown retention systems and loading direction on the stress magnitude of posterior implant-supported restorations: A 3D-FEA.
Tribst JPM; de Jager N; Dal Piva AMO; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer A
Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(6):e28129. PubMed ID: 38515675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-based buccal augmentation for ideal prosthetic implant alignment-an optimized method and report on 7 cases with pronounced buccal concavities.
Nickenig HJ; Riekert M; Zirk M; Lentzen MP; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):3999-4010. PubMed ID: 35066689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross-pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists.
Sambrook RJ; Judge RB; Abuzaar MA
Aust Dent J; 2012 Dec; 57(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 23186563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations?
Strong SM
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18254555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Assenza B; Leghissa GC; Di Bonaventura G; Catamo G; Piccolomini R
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1146-50. PubMed ID: 11577944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cross-pin retained implant supported restoration: a study of gasket placement and leakage.
Sambrook RJ; Judge RB
Aust Dent J; 2012 Dec; 57(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 23186564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]