239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23187722)
1. When trying hard isn't natural: women's belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns.
Smith JL; Lewis KL; Hawthorne L; Hodges SD
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 23187722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers.
Diekman AB; Brown ER; Johnston AM; Clark EK
Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1051-7. PubMed ID: 20631322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unstable identity compatibility: how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
Ahlqvist S; London B; Rosenthal L
Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1644-52. PubMed ID: 23818652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Stout JG; Dasgupta N; Hunsinger M; McManus MA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Feb; 100(2):255-70. PubMed ID: 21142376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive underrepresented students' sense of belonging to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Rattan A; Savani K; Komarraju M; Morrison MM; Boggs C; Ambady N
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 115(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 29911882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: evidence for a goal congruity perspective.
Diekman AB; Clark EK; Johnston AM; Brown ER; Steinberg M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):902-18. PubMed ID: 21859224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations.
Ceci SJ; Williams WM; Barnett SM
Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):218-61. PubMed ID: 19254079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering.
Dasgupta N; Scircle MM; Hunsinger M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(16):4988-93. PubMed ID: 25848061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.
Good C; Rattan A; Dweck CS
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):700-17. PubMed ID: 22288527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure.
Pinxten M; Marsh HW; De Fraine B; Van Den Noortgate W; Van Damme J
Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Mar; 84(Pt 1):152-74. PubMed ID: 24547759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
Ceci SJ; Ginther DK; Kahn S; Williams WM
Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2014 Dec; 15(3):75-141. PubMed ID: 26172066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers.
Logel C; Walton GM; Spencer SJ; Iserman EC; von Hippel W; Bell AE
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19469589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering.
Smith JL; Cech E; Metz A; Huntoon M; Moyer C
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2014 Jul; 20(3):413-29. PubMed ID: 25045952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What looks like sexism and why? The effect of comment type and perpetrator type on women's perceptions of sexism.
Riemer A; Chaudoir S; Earnshaw V
J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(3):263-79. PubMed ID: 24940815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attracting STEM talent: do STEM students prefer traditional or work/life-interaction labs?
DeFraine WC; Williams WM; Ceci SJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89801. PubMed ID: 24587044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of everyday romantic goal pursuit on women's attitudes toward math and science.
Park LE; Young AF; Troisi JD; Pinkus RT
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1259-73. PubMed ID: 21617021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychosocial Pathways to STEM Engagement among Graduate Students in the Life Sciences.
Clark SL; Dyar C; Maung N; London B
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 27562961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific community. No sexism in science? Not so fast, critics say.
Bernstein R
Science; 2014 Nov; 346(6211):798. PubMed ID: 25395513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering.
Dennehy TC; Dasgupta N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(23):5964-5969. PubMed ID: 28533360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The costs and benefits of sexism: resistance to influence during relationship conflict.
Overall NC; Sibley CG; Tan R
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Aug; 101(2):271-90. PubMed ID: 21534701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
