These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23188111)

  • 1. Evaluation of an effective multifaceted implementation strategy for elective single-embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization.
    Kreuwel IA; van Peperstraten AM; Hulscher ME; Kremer JA; Grol RP; Nelen WL; Hermens RP
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 23188111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.
    van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
    Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
    van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Custers IM; König TE; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Kaaijk E; Oosterhuis J; Mochtar MH; Repping S; van Wely M; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Day 3 embryo selection by metabolomic profiling of culture medium with near-infrared spectroscopy as an adjunct to morphology: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vergouw CG; Kieslinger DC; Kostelijk EH; Botros LL; Schats R; Hompes PG; Sakkas D; Lambalk CB
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Aug; 27(8):2304-11. PubMed ID: 22647453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program.
    Hernandez Torres E; Navarro-Espigares JL; Clavero A; López-Regalado M; Camacho-Ballesta JA; Onieva-García M; Martínez L; Castilla JA
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 25557244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individualized decision-making in IVF: calculating the chances of pregnancy.
    van Loendersloot LL; van Wely M; Repping S; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2972-80. PubMed ID: 23925394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome and feasibility of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy for the first and second IVF/ICSI attempts.
    Gremeau AS; Brugnon F; Bouraoui Z; Pekrishvili R; Janny L; Pouly JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jan; 160(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 22178171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semi-automated morphometric analysis of human embryos can reveal correlations between total embryo volume and clinical pregnancy.
    Paternot G; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM; Spiessens C
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):627-33. PubMed ID: 23315063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
    Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M
    Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementing targeted expectant management in fertility care using prognostic modelling: a cluster randomized trial with a multifaceted strategy.
    Kersten FAM; Nelen WLDM; van den Boogaard NM; van Rumste MM; Koks CA; IntHout J; Verhoeve HR; Pelinck MJ; Boks DES; Gianotten J; Broekmans FJM; Goddijn M; Braat DDM; Mol BWJ; Hermens RPGM;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1648-1657. PubMed ID: 28591847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of a multifaceted empowerment strategy on decision making about the number of embryos transferred in in vitro fertilisation: randomised controlled trial.
    van Peperstraten A; Nelen W; Grol R; Zielhuis G; Adang E; Stalmeier P; Hermens R; Kremer J
    BMJ; 2010 Sep; 341():c2501. PubMed ID: 20884700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study.
    Hope N; Rombauts L
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 19442970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals.
    van Peperstraten AM; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Jansen L; Scheenjes E; Braat DD; Grol RP; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):2036-42. PubMed ID: 18565969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to demonstrate that eSET does not compromise the likelihood of having a baby?
    Bechoua S; Astruc K; Thouvenot S; Girod S; Chiron A; Jimenez C; Sagot P
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3073-81. PubMed ID: 19752013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
    Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.
    Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Banks NK; Graham JR
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Dec; 92(6):1895-906. PubMed ID: 18976755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.