255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23188416)
1. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement.
Ding FH; Li Y; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Wang JG
J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23188416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of noninvasive assessments of central blood pressure using general transfer function and late systolic shoulder of the radial pressure wave.
Wohlfahrt P; Krajcoviechová A; Seidlerová J; Mayer O; Filipovsky J; Cífková R
Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23999585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of central systolic blood pressure by pulse volume plethysmography with a noninvasive blood pressure monitor.
Sung SH; Cheng HM; Chuang SY; Shih YT; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2012 May; 25(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 22278210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of central blood pressure devices on the basis of a modified protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: application to the Centron cBP301.
Agnoletti D; Millasseau S; Topouchian J; Safar ME; Blacher J
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 24418970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of central pressure estimates obtained from SphygmoCor, Omron HEM-9000AI and carotid applanation tonometry.
Kips JG; Schutte AE; Vermeersch SJ; Huisman HW; Van Rooyen JM; Glyn MC; Fourie CM; Malan L; Schutte R; Van Bortel LM; Segers P
J Hypertens; 2011 Jun; 29(6):1115-20. PubMed ID: 21505351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of central aortic systolic pressure using late systolic inflection of radial artery pulse and its application to vasodilator therapy.
Takazawa K; Kobayashi H; Kojima I; Aizawa A; Kinoh M; Sugo Y; Shimizu M; Miyawaki Y; Tanaka N; Yamashina A; Avolio A
J Hypertens; 2012 May; 30(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 22469836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system.
Kang JH; Lee DI; Kim S; Kim SW; Im SI; Na JO; Choi CU; Lim HE; Kim JW; Kim EJ; Han SW; Rha SW; Seo HS; Oh DJ; Park CG
Hypertens Res; 2012 Mar; 35(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22158112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
