380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23188433)
1. Correlations between colposcopy and histologic results from colposcopically directed biopsy in cervical precancerous lesions.
Boicea A; Pătraşcu A; Surlin V; Iliescu D; Schenker M; Chiuţu L
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(3 Suppl):735-41. PubMed ID: 23188433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopic evaluation of pre-invasive and early cervical carcinoma with histologic correlation.
Shahida SM; Mirza TT; Saleh AF; Islam MA
Mymensingh Med J; 2012 Apr; 21(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 22561759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of Correlation of Cervical Epithelial Thickness With the Grade of Colposcopic Abnormality.
Ghosh I; Mittal S; Banerjee D; Chowdhury N; Basu P
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 May; 35(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 26598985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Role of colposcopy in high-grade CIN (CIN II-III)].
Scarpellini M; Monti F; Fulgenzi P; Papaleo R; Tononi A; Pini E; Oliverio G; Ravaioli A
Minerva Ginecol; 1994; 46(7-8):385-9. PubMed ID: 7970072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL
Minerva Ginecol; 2012 Apr; 64(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 22481626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.
Petousis S; Christidis P; Margioula-Siarkou C; Sparangis N; Athanasiadis A; Kalogiannidis I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1271-1275. PubMed ID: 29442140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade].
Starzewski J; Góźdź S; Chil A; Piasek G; Plutecki J; Smorag L; Dembowska R; Krawczyk J
Wiad Lek; 2003; 56(3-4):162-6. PubMed ID: 12923964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.
Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Nishide K; Nozue A; Shimabukuro K; Endo S; Nagai K; Oki A; Minaguchi T; Morishita Y; Noguchi M; Yoshikawa H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 20(3):579-85. PubMed ID: 25145298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of colposcopic punch biopsy in the management of abnormal cervical cytology: a 5-year retrospective audit.
Kahramanoglu I; Demirkiran F; Turan H; Bese T; Yilmaz N; Ilvan S; Arvas M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 30230394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Hu S; Zhang X; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 21436729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colposcopic biopsies versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure cone histology in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women.
Del Priore G; Gilmore PR; Maag T; Warshal DP; Cheon TH
J Reprod Med; 1996 Sep; 41(9):653-7. PubMed ID: 8887189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
