These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23188742)

  • 1. Magnitude effects for experienced rewards at short delays in the escalating interest task.
    Young ME; Webb TL; Sutherland SC; Jacobs EA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 23188742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deciding when to "cash in" when outcomes are continuously improving: an escalating interest task.
    Young ME; Webb TL; Jacobs EA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 21871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A delay discounting task produces a greater likelihood of waiting than a deferred gratification task.
    Young ME; McCoy AW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):180-95. PubMed ID: 25515382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced access to reinforcement drives delay discounting during experienced delays.
    Macaskill AC; Thompson-Davies K; Hunt MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):416-428. PubMed ID: 37694442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.
    Marshall AT; Smith AP; Kirkpatrick K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 24965705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():134-48. PubMed ID: 26506254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to changing contingencies in an impulsivity task.
    Young ME; Webb TL; Rung JM; Jacobs EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 23658118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the nucleus accumbens core in impulsive choice, timing, and reward processing.
    Galtress T; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 124(1):26-43. PubMed ID: 20141278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning to wait for more likely or just more: greater tolerance to delays of reward with increasingly longer delays.
    Rung JM; Young ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):108-24. PubMed ID: 25641081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting.
    Ballard K; Knutson B
    Neuroimage; 2009 Mar; 45(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19071223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalizability of time-based interventions: Effects of choice procedure and smaller-sooner delay.
    Smith TR; Panfil K; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2022 Mar; 196():104584. PubMed ID: 35033629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Durability and generalizability of time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice in rats.
    Bailey C; Peterson JR; Schnegelsiepen A; Stuebing SL; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jul; 152():54-62. PubMed ID: 29544866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of reward delays on responses of dopamine neurons.
    Kobayashi S; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 28(31):7837-46. PubMed ID: 18667616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance.
    Kable JW; Caulfield MK; Falcone M; McConnell M; Bernardo L; Parthasarathi T; Cooper N; Ashare R; Audrain-McGovern J; Hornik R; Diefenbach P; Lee FJ; Lerman C
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(31):7390-7402. PubMed ID: 28694338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.
    Steele CC; Peterson JR; Marshall AT; Stuebing SL; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():28-38. PubMed ID: 29146281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When Smaller Sooner Depletes a Pool of Resources Faster.
    Young ME; Howatt BC
    Exp Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):215-231. PubMed ID: 38230883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Waiting to decide helps in the face of probabilistic uncertainty but not delay uncertainty.
    Young ME; Sutherland SC; Cole JJ; Nguyen N
    Learn Behav; 2011 May; 39(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 21264567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reward processing and intertemporal decision making in adults and adolescents: the role of impulsivity and decision consistency.
    Ripke S; Hübner T; Mennigen E; Müller KU; Rodehacke S; Schmidt D; Jacob MJ; Smolka MN
    Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 1478():36-47. PubMed ID: 22940231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for a magnitude effect in temporal discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22229590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience Matters: The Effects of Hypothetical versus Experiential Delays and Magnitudes on Impulsive Choice in Delay Discounting Tasks.
    Steele CC; Gwinner M; Smith T; Young ME; Kirkpatrick K
    Brain Sci; 2019 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 31888218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.