BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23188801)

  • 1. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Mifune N; Hashimoto H; Li Y; Shinada M; Miura A; Inukai K; Takagishi H; Simunovic D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20364-8. PubMed ID: 23188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A test of the strong reciprocity model: relationship between cooperation and punishment].
    Li Y; Yamagishi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2014 Apr; 85(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24804436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Takagishi H; Shinada M; Tanida S; Cook KS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(28):11520-3. PubMed ID: 19564602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game.
    Li J; Cheng N; Hou W
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 33594817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individuals in the criminal justice system show differences in cooperative behaviour: Implications from cooperative games.
    Clark BC; Thorne CB; Hendricks PS; Sharp C; Clark SK; Cropsey KL
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):169-80. PubMed ID: 24910424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overcoming selfishness: reciprocity, inhibition, and cardiac-autonomic control in the ultimatum game.
    Sütterlin S; Herbert C; Schmitt M; Kübler A; Vögele C
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():173. PubMed ID: 21847383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diverging effects of clean versus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal behavior.
    Yang Q; Wu X; Zhou X; Mead NL; Vohs KD; Baumeister RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):473-89. PubMed ID: 23127377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cooperation and depressive symptoms.
    Brendan Clark C; Thorne CB; Hardy S; Cropsey KL
    J Affect Disord; 2013 Sep; 150(3):1184-7. PubMed ID: 23726777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gossip in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games: Its Immediate and Downstream Consequences for Cooperation.
    Wu J; Balliet D; Kou Y; Van Lange PAM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():651. PubMed ID: 30984073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cocaine use disorder in females is associated with altered social decision-making: a study with the prisoner's dilemma and the ultimatum game.
    Viola TW; Niederauer JPO; Kluwe-Schiavon B; Sanvicente-Vieira B; Grassi-Oliveira R
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Jul; 19(1):211. PubMed ID: 31277620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game.
    Brañas-Garza P; Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B
    Sci Rep; 2014 Aug; 4():6025. PubMed ID: 25113502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The carrot and the stick: How guilt and shame facilitate reciprocity-driven cooperation.
    Bică A; Crețu RZ
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Feb; 37(1):117-127. PubMed ID: 36368913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rejection of unfair offers can be driven by negative emotions, evidence from modified ultimatum games with anonymity.
    Ma N; Li N; He XS; Sun DL; Zhang X; Zhang DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39619. PubMed ID: 22761845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Development of Theory of Mind and Positive and Negative Reciprocity in Preschool Children.
    Schug J; Takagishi H; Benech C; Okada H
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():888. PubMed ID: 27445881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.