121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23188890)
1. Using scratch card technology for random allocation concealment in a clinical trial with a crossover design.
Beksinska ME; Joanis C; Smit JA; Pienaar J; Piaggio G
Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 23188890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.
Doig GS; Simpson F
J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance and safety of the second-generation female condom (FC2) versus the Woman's, the VA worn-of-women, and the Cupid female condoms: a randomised controlled non-inferiority crossover trial.
Beksinska ME; Piaggio G; Smit JA; Wu J; Zhang Y; Pienaar J; Greener R; Zhou Y; Joanis C
Lancet Glob Health; 2013 Sep; 1(3):e146-52. PubMed ID: 25104263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practice makes perfect: reduction in female condom failures and user problems with short-term experience in a randomized trial.
Beksinska M; Smit J; Joanis C; Hart C
Contraception; 2012 Aug; 86(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22264667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
Pildal J; Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1049. PubMed ID: 15817527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering.
Schulz KF; Grimes DA
Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9306):614-8. PubMed ID: 11867132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some practical problems in implementing randomization.
Downs M; Tucker K; Christ-Schmidt H; Wittes J
Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 20484491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review finds that the autoreply e-mail function avoids problems of subject allocation concealment.
Cunningham A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 16713518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An effectiveness trial of a diagnostic test in a busy outpatients department in a developing country: issues around allocation concealment and envelope randomization.
Swingler GH; Zwarenstein M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 53(7):702-6. PubMed ID: 10941947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection bias, allocation concealment and randomization design in clinical trials.
Zhao W
Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):263-5. PubMed ID: 23871796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomization for clinical research: an easy-to-use spreadsheet method.
Padhye NS; Cron SG; Gusick GM; Hamlin SK; Hanneman SK
Res Nurs Health; 2009 Oct; 32(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 19606450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reporting of methods for reducing and detecting bias: an example from the WHO Misoprostol Third Stage of Labour equivalence randomised controlled trial.
Piaggio G; Elbourne D; Schulz KF; Villar J; Pinol AP; Gülmezoglu AM;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Oct; 3():19. PubMed ID: 14525622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
